Jump to content

Slam is cold but we sold out


helene_t

  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Over North's 3He, East could reasonably

    • Pass (as she actually did)
    • Dbl (suggests five spade)
      0
    • Dbl (just DSIP)
    • 3Sp (implies some club support)
    • 3Sp (does not imply club support)
    • 4He (two places to play)
      0
  2. 2. If E passes, W could (over 3He) reasonably

    • Pass (as she actually did)
    • dbl
    • she fixed herself by bidding only 3cl, should have done something else (explain)
      0
  3. 3. If E doubles, W could reasonably bid



Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=s&e=skt532h63dj94ca32&w=saq6h5daq6ckj9864&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=2dp2s3c3hppp]266|200[/hv]

Towards the end of the swiss teams at the Cumbria Congress we were bombed back towards the middle of the field, after a flying start in the first three matches. So there isn't much left to fight for but of course we still want to do our best.

 

Bluejak is South and his partner opens a multi (weak only, can be five cards) 2 to which he gives a paradox response (not necessarily constructive).

 

Although slam happens to be cold it probably isn't one you really want to be in in, but at least we should have bid game. Teammates sacrificed with 5 over 4, I don't know how the auction went at their table but multi is quite unusual in this area so North probably opened 2.

 

The number of questions appear to be limited to three, but it might also be interesting to discuss what E could have done if W reopens with a double.

 

(This was board 20. For those who know the deal: NS have been switched as have EW because I couldn't figure out how to correct dealer in a hand diagram).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would bid 3, with double as the second choice and 4 as the third choice. West should definitely reopen with a double as well. If assigning blame I'd give slightly more to West as I can sort of understand East's pass but the reopening double is completely automatic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

East should definitely bid 3 over 3. That won't usually have short clubs, because with short clubs you're unlikely to have enough to bid. Something like AQJxxx xxx xxx x is possible, however.

 

If East were to double 3, I think it would be for takeout, suggesting four spades but not denying five.

 

With the West hand I'd double 3, but I don't think it's automatic. Partner hasn't acted, so he probably doesn't have a great hand. I don't really want to be in 4 opposite a 4342 6-count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

#1 I think East should pass 3H.

#2 I think West should reopen, ..., I am not sure, I would have done it.

#3 4C - The X certainly does not show 5 spades, why should it.

 

In the end, thy got you, ..., that is all one can say.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Just saw, after reading the other comments, that East passed 3H in the

knowledge of a club fit, slower reading is sometimes useful.

If East knowes the fit, than he should bid, depening on your agreement

set, for us 3S implies fit, but even if you dont have this agreement,

3S should show toelerance, i.e. xx in clubs.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does west really have a 4 bid over x? I think 4 people have misread the third question or I am bad at bridge (which is true, but maybe both are true).

 

I misread the question. I thought I was being asked what East should do if West doubles 3.

 

If East doubles 3, West should bid 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Hog: 3 by E is clear, but if he's asleep then Dbl from W is clear.

 

I voted everything to the last question because I didn't understand why E should Dbl and we can't vote to only 2 questions - afterwards it appeared to be a typo zzz... <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would double as east. 3 does not suggest club support in my book. We need to have some standards about overcalling after a multi 2, so a good spade suit is still very possible if the hand is weakish.

Pass is really unthinkable as east. If not double or 3, then why not at least 4? The hand is certainly strong enough for that.

 

If east passes, then west has a model takeout double of 3. I disagree that this is a close decision at all.

 

If east doubles, then west could bid 4 showing a strong flexible hand. Then E-W would land in 4, which is their right contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...