Jump to content

2 loser hand and partner opens


Fluffy

Recommended Posts

Uninteresting hand I guess, partner has Kx and a 4 card minor, so if you pick the "right" minor right now you won't be able to win slam on that strain.

 

You might lure partner into bidding 6NT, but since he also has AKQJx he might just as well bid 6 wich fails miserably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like you need to double, and when partner bids 2, bid 3 which will cause him to bid 3N, then you can bid something, ask for aces and put him back into NT.

 

I've held a 4 loser hand and heard partner open 2. My hand was x, A, AKxxx, Axxxxx, partner had AKQ10xxxx, KQ10x, x, void, we bid 2-3-4-7N. If they lead a spade you have to pitch A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought of something terrifyingly creative. What about cuebidding 3, then bidding 5 to ask for a control?

 

If partner doesn't have a heart control, they are very likely to have solid spades... It might work. I'd never try this at the table, but it's an interesting idea on paper.

 

As it is, partner would bid 5N over 5 to show a positional heart card, and we'd happily raise to 6.

 

If partner bids 6, we have to guess whether it's a stiff or the ace, which is why this is a bad idea, but an intriguing one nonetheless. Perhaps we could use OS5NT someplace :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought of something terrifyingly creative. What about cuebidding 3, then bidding 5 to ask for a control?

 

If partner doesn't have a heart control, they are very likely to have solid spades... It might work. I'd never try this at the table, but it's an interesting idea on paper.

 

As it is, partner would bid 5N over 5 to show a positional heart card, and we'd happily raise to 6.

 

If partner bids 6, we have to guess whether it's a stiff or the ace, which is why this is a bad idea, but an intriguing one nonetheless. Perhaps we could use OS5NT someplace :P

 

This would work great if partner bids 6 or, even better, 6 to show the A (assuming, of course, that partner has good spades (what else could he have?)).

 

Of course, if partner doesn't have a heart control, he will pass 5. That may not be the best spot. You state that partner is very likely to have solid spades. I agree that he must have very good spades. But AKQxx opposite a void is not that great a suit at the 5 level when you are off 2 heart tricks (Give partner AKQxx QJx xx xxx, or some variation on that theme - AKJxxx QJx xx xx, AKxxxxx QJx x xx, etc.).

 

That would be very unlucky, but not out of the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought of something terrifyingly creative. What about cuebidding 3, then bidding 5 to ask for a control?

 

I once played this guy (a brilliant mathematician, by the way), who insisted on cuebidding with just about anything he felt like. I would then have to guess what he had and act accordingly. It was a nightmare.

 

Obviously, he always had some argument why his bid couldn't be anything but his actual hand. As you can imagine, we stopped playing at some stage :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably why we should play transfers.

1S (2H)

 

Double: simple S raise.

2S: transfer to NT.

2N: transfer to C.

3C: transfer to D.

3D: S limit raise.

3H: gf raise to S.

3S: constructive raise with 4 or more S.

 

Forget that. I've tried it and it's not fit for players below professional status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...