sathyab Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 [hv=pc=n&s=sj53haj543dak7cq2]133|100[/hv] R/W at MP, LHO deals, passes and opponents are silent the rest of the auction, which proceeds as follows. 1♣ 1♥1♠ 2♦2♥ 2nt3♣ You could bid 3♥ now (or perhaps 3 artificial ♦s; if you do, is that still considered 4th suit or 5th ?), but that'll get you to 4♥ far too often. It's a new partnership, no discussion of whether 2nt followed by 3nt promises 5♥s, except possibly that a second suit over 3♣ promises a 5-bagger and that a direct 3nt would deny one. Having said that, I might have the same problem in a more established partnership as well. My problem now is that if partner's ♣s are decent such as say KJTxxx or even KJxxxx and ♥s relatively weak, 3nt might easily produce the same number of tricks as 4♥. Or say some other hand like KQxx xxx - AKxxxx, is an excellent 3nt, they might need to lead a ♥ to stop 12 tricks, but 4♥ makes only 10 tricks most of the time. But if his ♣ are weaker, 4♥ gives you time to establish them. Is there way to offer a meaningful choice of games to partner or should you bid/gamble 3nt yourself ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 I don't think your methods should be geared to finding 3NT when you have an eight-card major suit fit and the short hand has a void in the unbid suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 I am not convinced that 3H will get you to 4H far too often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.