Cascade Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 Dealer: North Vul: None Scoring: MP ♠ 76 ♥ J62 ♦ AJ972 ♣ Q52 ♠ 10983 ♥ K10873 ♦ 1065 ♣ 10 1♣ (1♦) Pass (3NT)All Pass Partner led the ♣4 3rd or 5th which ran to declarer's King. ♦K then diamond to the Jack and then the ♦A - Partner had ♦Q43. On the third diamond declarer pitched a club. On the fourth diamond you pitch a heart and declarer and partner pitch clubs. What do you pitch on the 5th diamond. Dealer: North Vul: None Scoring: MP ♠ 76 ♥ J62 ♦ 2 ♣ Q5 ♠ 10983 ♥ K1073 ♦ ♣ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytoox Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 throw another h, declarer shld be 4324. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 The bovious thing I see is that the ♣3 is missing, nobody discarded it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulhar Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 The bovious thing I see is that the ♣3 is missing, nobody discarded it? I'm waiting on some information too; (1) what clubs were discarded (2) what order your partner played his small diamonds in, and would that matter in your partnership? (3) does your partner ever open 4-card majors (and if so, when?) (4) do the opponents play a new suit advance forcing? (I'd like to try to rule out a five-bagger in declarer's hand) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted September 3, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 Declarer's discarded clubs were the three and the seven. Partner's play in diamonds was irrelevant - our only method was reverse count (up-side-down count) but that is not relevant here and we have no alternative meaning when that does not apply - i guess in a desperate situation we could play a suit-preference card. Partner would never open a four-card major with five clubs - well not in first seat.We do play four-card majors but normally we would open the lower of two four-card suits. New suit by advancer is non-forcing for this east west pair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulhar Posted September 4, 2004 Report Share Posted September 4, 2004 Forgot a question - but I'm going to make an assumption that you DON'T play a weak notrump; for if you did, I think it is obvious. Partner would have to be 4-1-3-5 (else he would have opened 1NT weak), so you have to hold onto your hearts. The thing that seems odd about this hand is that declarer pitched his link to his second club trick. That would imply that he doesn't care about leading to the CQ. If he's going to use hearts, leading to the CQ seems necessary to finesse your H10 after you cover the jack. Maybe he holds S-AKxx and H-Qxx and is hoping somebody with four spades will pitch one. But this is absurd! Why not just lead to the CQ? I can't see what declarer's doing but it it's hard to see how pitching another heart can cost. So I do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 5, 2004 Report Share Posted September 5, 2004 Why didn´t west bid his major?, too bad suit?, or the kind of player that only bids 5 card suits on this position?. Here the problem seems to be passsive/agressive, a ♥ can hardly cost a trick.. unless you can make 4♥ triks!, that looks less likelly than west having 4♠ actually, since a MP problem I´ll discard a ♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulhar Posted September 5, 2004 Report Share Posted September 5, 2004 or the kind of player that only bids 5 card suits on this position? I hope that all of my partners are 'that kind of player'. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted September 5, 2004 Report Share Posted September 5, 2004 To me it feels right to keep a 4 card H suit. I am going to assume that declarer would have shown a 5 card major (no certainty there). He had doubleton Diamond and, from Club lead and discards it seems that he had 4 Clubs. So he started with 3-4-2-4 or 4-3-2-4. I don't think that the subsequent play clarifies which. If he started with 4-3-2-4 and discarded a Spade then I don't see it mattering a whole heap what you discard. However if he started with 3-4-2-4 shape then coming down to a 3 card Heart suit could be costly. So I pitch a Spade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted September 5, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2004 Forgot a question - but I'm going to make an assumption that you DON'T play a weak notrump; for if you did, I think it is obvious. Partner would have to be 4-1-3-5 (else he would have opened 1NT weak), so you have to hold onto your hearts. duh I completely missed this inference. The good news is that I don't think that this is the reason that my partner thought that it was obvious. It is amazing how easily one can have a blind spot. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted September 5, 2004 Report Share Posted September 5, 2004 Pitch high spade to avoid !S endplay.... and being forced to lead away from the heart king. Myabe it is, as your partner says, obvious (keep that small spade). Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted September 6, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2004 or the kind of player that only bids 5 card suits on this position? I hope that all of my partners are 'that kind of player'. :D How do you find your 4-4 major suit fit after a 1♦ overcall? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulhar Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 How do you find your 4-4 major suit fit after a 1♦ overcall? My partner didn't double 1C, he bid 1D. So if he has a four card major, he must be short in the other major. It's no disaster playing in diamonds (or perhaps notrump) if the other side has a fit in a major suit too. Frequently opener will bid partner's short major and partner can double. I prefer to find my much more likely 5-3 fits in this situation. Auctions frequently get competitive after opener bids again and it's good for overcaller to be able to compete in advancer's suit with only 3 cards, a much more likely holding. 4-card advances are a little more palatable when playing new suit forcing by advancer but I still prefer 5 then too. I admit that sometimes you get stuck with a decent hand when advancing and you might have to manufacture a bid on a 4-card suit because nothing seems right. But I think it's the exception rather than the rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 i'm tossing a heart and covering the ♥J, if it's led... maybe ben's right about the endplay, but i don't know... i do keep my low spade, if spades are led i discard high Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 I prefer to find my much more likely 5-3 fits in this situation. Auctions frequently get competitive after opener bids again and it's good for overcaller to be able to compete in advancer's suit with only 3 cards, a much more likely holding. After 1♦-(X)-you overcall 4 card majors. but After (1♣)-1♦-p-you overcall 5 card... I am not really sure, but I believe the first one is a much more competitive tending sequence than second. Its probably a matter of style, When my partner fails to double it doesn´t mean he has shortness on the other major, but that he has too many ♣ normally, also 4 card♦ overcalls are very frequent for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helium Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 I prefer to find my much more likely 5-3 fits in this situation. Auctions frequently get competitive after opener bids again and it's good for overcaller to be able to compete in advancer's suit with only 3 cards, a much more likely holding. After 1♦-(X)-you overcall 4 card majors. but After (1♣)-1♦-p-you overcall 5 card... I am not really sure, but I believe the first one is a much more competitive tending sequence than second. Its probably a matter of style, When my partner fails to double it doesn´t mean he has shortness on the other major, but that he has too many ♣ normally, also 4 card♦ overcalls are very frequent for us. Agree i play it like this too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.