Jump to content

A reason to play inverted minors


Free

What do you bid?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you bid?

    • 1H
      3
    • 2C
      5
    • 2NT
      7
    • 3D
      3
    • 3NT
      4
    • 4D
      1
    • 5D
      0
    • Other
      2


Recommended Posts

I presume that if I don't play inverted minors, then I play a 2NT response forcing. This is matchpoints and the most likely contract is 3NT, so I try to get there giving the opponents as little information as possible. (IMO this denies a four card major so partner shouldn't show one.)

 

If partner doesn't bid the expected 3NT, my next bid will show suppport for diamonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure of the intention of the question.

 

I responded as I would bid with my partner playing our system since no system was stated.

 

I respond 2NT which for us is game forcing, balanced-ish (no singleton) and shows 4+ diamonds.

 

In response opener can:

 

Ask for controls with 3

 

Show a singleton with 3// - 3 shows a club singleton

 

After opener shows a singleton responder can sign-off in 3NT or show controls.

 

Opener can also attempt to sign-off in 3NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, perhaps some clarification: you play as natural as it can get... So I think 2NT should be invitational hand, not GF, no?

I went into 'Explore Bridge' and both SAYC Basic and the 'Learn to Play Bridge software' state that 1D-2NT shows 13-15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that is SAYC but it is not natural.

What is not natural about it?

 

2NT showing 13-15 might or might not be natural. I don't think the fact that it woudl be forcing would make it not natural.

 

Certainly according to the laws that does not make it conventional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that is SAYC but it is not natural.

What is not natural about it?

 

2NT showing 13-15 might or might not be natural. I don't think the fact that it woudl be forcing would make it not natural.

 

Certainly according to the laws that does not make it conventional.

Interesting. At the risk of hijacking the thread...

 

Certain authorities try to restrict the use of very weak NTs by preventing one using conventions opposite them.

 

Would 2NT balanced and forcing (acting in a staymanesque manner) be considered OK?

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without inverted minors, this hand qualifies for a 3D limit raise, showing 11-12 points and 5 card support. I'll agree it's a bit of an underbid, given the excellent controls and diamond suit quality, but it's the bid that fits your hand the closest. Pard may pass 3D, but in practice that will be very very rare.

 

So that was the technical bid. As for other tactics, imaginative bidders can try a 1H or 2C reply here and see how it goes. Hogs might just shoot at 3NT. After all, they'll be declaring and that counts as 2 or 3 extra points :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always play inverted minors since 40 years.

There are many similar hands.

You need a forcing minor-suit raise.

I pd wants to play goren ok. 1 - 3 is forcing, I'll go with this.

But never play a system without a poss. for a forcing minor-raise.

 

regards

 

Al

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously 1, its your longest outside suit, and keeps the auction at cheapest level, sincec we play natural I assume partner don´t play that rare convention of raising with 3 cards my major, ,therefore the worse that can happen is we land on a cold 4.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...