Jump to content

Forcing or NF?


awm

1D-1S-2D-2H  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Is 1D-1S-2D-2H forcing?

    • Yes, forcing
    • No, not forcing
    • Same as 1D-1S-Pass-2H


Recommended Posts

Your options above are not mutually exclusive.

 

Right.

 

I want to check #2 and #3.

Absent an agreement otherwise, I'd assume it's the same as if responder passed; and absent an agreement about that, new suit by advancer NF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many playing negative free bids :)

 

The have a fit, it is a competitive auction, we need to be able to compete for the partscore on as many hands as possible.

 

Non forcing makes much more sense than forcing.

 

I happen to play

 

(1m) 1 (Pass) 2 as forcing

 

but even these auctions i think there is a good case for non-forcing although there are some issues with what to do with forcing hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I play 2H as forcing after 3rd hand passes, our general rule is that these bids are non-forcing when everyone is bidding. If you have a good hand you double first. If you have a serious single-suiter with hearts you are slightly stuffed because we play 2H as non-forcing and 3H as fit, so you have to just bid 4H (hardly a disaster) or double then bid hearts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All four hands bidding, 1-1-2-2. Is the 2 bid forcing?

 

 

Playing BWS2001 defaults:

no, non-forcing, but I think it should show a good 5card. The forcing bid is Double= for T/O or showing general values, depending on the level.

I am not sure what a cue-bid 3 would mean. Is it simply a good raise to 3 ? or a Western style cue-bid. I do not find a clue to this in the BWSdocument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was recently asked about this at a local club game. My response was that "standard" would be 2 not forcing here. I was then asked what to do with a forcing hand, and said that you are somewhat fixed. :)

 

Personally I like to play 2 as forcing in this sequence, but with a pickup expert partner I would certainly assume NF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As per Mike Lawrence's Overcalls, 2 is NF, 3 is natural, inv, and X followed by hearts would be GF.

 

3 as a fit-jump makes sense too.

 

Indeed. Go back to the Masters.

Lots to learn !

 

Yes, what about 3.

In line with my other methods (BWS2001) this would be a one suited hand, NF, but inviting ....If partner is not absolutely minimum for his overcall, or has a good hand in he can bid game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...