awm Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 All four hands bidding, 1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥. Is the 2♥ bid forcing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordontd Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Your options above are not mutually exclusive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 I think I'm in a minority, but I play all of these as forcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Not to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Your options above are not mutually exclusive. Right. I want to check #2 and #3.Absent an agreement otherwise, I'd assume it's the same as if responder passed; and absent an agreement about that, new suit by advancer NF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wank Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 i play it as NF when responder passes. given responder's bid there's even more reason to play it as NF - you can now double as well with a strong hand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 So many playing negative free bids :) The have a fit, it is a competitive auction, we need to be able to compete for the partscore on as many hands as possible. Non forcing makes much more sense than forcing. I happen to play (1m) 1♠ (Pass) 2♥ as forcing but even these auctions i think there is a good case for non-forcing although there are some issues with what to do with forcing hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlson Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 I think it's pretty clear that the third option is supposed to be "forcing if and only if you play the other sequence as forcing". Anyway, I would say NF even though I think the other sequence is forcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduran1216 Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Seems like its gonna come up most often when competing for a partscore and trying to find the best spot, so non forcing, but constructive, the 2D bid is relevant, because I can force by making a responsive double and bidding again to show good stuff I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Although I play 2H as forcing after 3rd hand passes, our general rule is that these bids are non-forcing when everyone is bidding. If you have a good hand you double first. If you have a serious single-suiter with hearts you are slightly stuffed because we play 2H as non-forcing and 3H as fit, so you have to just bid 4H (hardly a disaster) or double then bid hearts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurpoa Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 All four hands bidding, 1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥. Is the 2♥ bid forcing? Playing BWS2001 defaults:no, non-forcing, but I think it should show a good 5card. The forcing bid is Double= for T/O or showing general values, depending on the level.I am not sure what a cue-bid 3♦ would mean. Is it simply a good raise to 3♠ ? or a Western style cue-bid. I do not find a clue to this in the BWSdocument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 I would 2H treat the same way, as I would treat it without the raise. Since 2H over 1S would be NF, ..., that may not come as a surprise. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 I play this as non-forcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 All four hands bidding, 1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥. Is the 2♥ bid forcing? and no one passing in-between? :P NF even if there is no 2♦ call on my right. I've changed this in the last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 I play that when three players bid, a new suit by the 4th is not forcing. Also 2-over-1 would be NF, 2-over-2 I play forcing as a 2-level overcall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straube Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 Move my vote to nf. I misread the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 All four hands bidding, 1♦-1♠-2♦-2♥. Is the 2♥ bid forcing? That depends on agreements. Mine is it's not forcing, but it would be if LHO hadn't bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted January 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2011 I was recently asked about this at a local club game. My response was that "standard" would be 2♥ not forcing here. I was then asked what to do with a forcing hand, and said that you are somewhat fixed. :) Personally I like to play 2♥ as forcing in this sequence, but with a pickup expert partner I would certainly assume NF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriegel Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 As per Mike Lawrence's Overcalls, 2♥ is NF, 3♥ is natural, inv, and X followed by hearts would be GF. 3♥ as a fit-jump makes sense too. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurpoa Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 As per Mike Lawrence's Overcalls, 2♥ is NF, 3♥ is natural, inv, and X followed by hearts would be GF. 3♥ as a fit-jump makes sense too. Indeed. Go back to the Masters.Lots to learn ! Yes, what about 3♥. In line with my other methods (BWS2001) this would be a one suited hand, NF, but inviting ....If partner is not absolutely minimum for his overcall, or has a good hand in ♥ he can bid game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mich-b Posted January 24, 2011 Report Share Posted January 24, 2011 NF.In addition to the obvious advantages of 2♥ being NF , it also gives better definition for the overcallers rebid , if he does not choose to Pass. For example 2♠ from him is 100% 6 cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.