Jump to content

What should this sequence show?


mr1303

Recommended Posts

Bidding sequence goes:

 

1NT (15-17) 2NT (transfer to diamonds)

3D (bad hand for diamonds) 3NT?

 

There will be a follow up question later...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could play that as just about anything. 6D with values for 3NT but unsure about it due to a weak suit somewhere (probably the "default" meaning if you haven't discussed it), mild slam try in diamonds (would have gone on if partner hadn't shown a bad hand), values for game with 6D4C, ...

 

Personally I hardly ever play 4 suit transfers, so have never had this come up - sorry.

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You had a slam try and when partner didn't like diamonds you signed off...

 

I guess the point is that you could psyche this so that if partner doesn't like you showed a slam try and if he did you showed a game invite? You give up some info about partners hand in order to make them make a bad lead, so it might be a good trade off.

 

Depending on your agreements on what an accept is it might be free to psyche this, if you have some strict rules about what an accept is it might be possible for partner to dislike diamonds but bid over a slam try? This would not be possible for me, my accept just means "I accept a game invite in diamonds." I don't think a hand exists that I could reject a game invite but accept a slam try but maybe it does, never thought about this tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very common English approach to four suit transfers is that you are only 'allowed' to accept with a top honour (A or K) in diamonds, the idea being that partner can bid 3NT if he now knows there's a good chance the suit is running. So on this sequence opener could still have, say, AKx Ax xxxx AQxx and is allowed to bid over 3NT

 

 

p.s. this method is pretty rubbish, because nowadays everyone just bids game anyway and hopes. But I still play it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, just to check, the consensus is that partner may have been interested in something else, but has now lost interest? FYI, Kxx or better support is required to bid 3C on this sequence. Is there a consensus that suggests opener is allowed to go on with a super-maximum?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would expect the consensus to be the opposite: partner asked you a question, you denied a specific set of holdings, and he signed off instead of persisting with another question if he liked something else.

 

I prefer the style where a high honour, but not a tripleton, is required. (But with the hand Frances posted, I wouldn't think of going on as opener - and I would be expecting a top for 660-instead-of-600)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...