gnasher Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Interesting argumentation on frequency grounds. Would it shift your thinking if you were in Europe, surrounded by people who hate 3-card raises (and for whom having 3 hearts would consequently not imply a maximum)?In the part of Europe where I live, raising with three-card support is completely normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted January 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 In the part of Europe where I live, raising with three-card support is completely normal. Wait I thought you live on an island somewhere off in the Atlantic Ocean! ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 As usual, J-Lo's posts are well thought out and Justin makes compelling arguments. But on a few points, I have to agree with PHIL ( pass the smelling salts, please ) although not on all things...lol ( I did re-read your posts, phil -- I now agree that 3H [ by Opener ] does not "agree Hts" ). I think, as phil and others have stated, the 3♥ bid would be better served to show 3 cards -- NOT 2 ( but IMO not attach any "extras" meaning -- didn't Opener's 2C rebid after his 1D open deny little, if any, extras ? ) . I think, if Opener has 2 cards Hts and no Sp-stop, he should rebid 3D or 3C -- the 3C being the last option as "could be only 4 cards" . Afterall, we have numerous cases where " Clubs get little or no respect ". But here is my main argument against what I would label " the ambiguous 3H bid " ( as showing 2 or 3 cards ) . You have eliminated " room " for Responder to make a 3H bid with at least 6 cards ( or a good 5 card Ht suit like in the OP [ post # 9 ]: A K Q J x ); and have subsequently eliminated clarification of the 5-of-trump bid and have eliminated the use of any RKC-asking bid ! ! Allowing room for Responder to bid 3H would NOW allow suit agreement by Opener ( with 2 cards ) which would clarify 4NT ( or 4S! ) as RKC and 5H! as "asking for a Sp Ctrl ": 1D - 1H 2C - 2S! 3D ( or 3C ) - 3H4H - 4NT( or 4S!) or 5H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Let me give you another cute auction: 1D 1S2C 2H3H ? I thought this was going to be the auction actually when I saw the thread. This came up recently. This auction is similar, but we are on firm ground that 3H always shows 4 hearts so there's no confusion there. And now for Justin's other 4SGF auction containing the Ht suit.I know he avoided "artificiality" , but I never do.I have a possible simple solution ( somewhat analogous to the Muppet solution for the problem hand [5s/4h] in Puppet auctions ): Switch the meanings of 2NT and 3H ! ! ! 1D - 1S2C - 2H!??..2S = have 3s ..2NT!= no 3s, but have 4h(w/4h Responder can now bid 3H[let the cuebidding begin]; anything else denies 4h)..3H! = no 3s, no 4h, but have Ht-stop ..3D = no 3s, no Ht-stop, but have 6d/4c or good-5d/4c..3C = no 3s, no Ht-stop, but have 5d/5c [ Edit: or not-so-good-5d/4c "catchall" ]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.