jillybean Posted December 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 I must have missed the memo that jillybean had become so good that her opinion could invalidate mine, and that she could dish out an lol on my opinion of a hand she asked about! ;)So did I. If that ever happened you wouldn't miss it, I'd be taking out a full page advertisment in the New York Times. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 What is "lol" about my statement. You bid to the best contract and asked for comments. I said only one bid is questionable, 2S. What is the problem? If you know everything there is to know about this hand that you feel the need to "lol" at my response to your thread, why bother posting it? Jilly I think if you do a quick simul you will find that 4♠ makes a ridiculous amount of the time opposite a minimal response but not quite enough to justify a 4♠ call so 3♠ is probably the %age call you might want to see as a reference the "convention with no name" which most people play IMO way too strong in terms of HCP values. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 4, 2011 Report Share Posted January 4, 2011 I've never heard of cwnn after 1♥-1♠ have you?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted January 4, 2011 Report Share Posted January 4, 2011 cwnn= convention with no name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 4, 2011 Report Share Posted January 4, 2011 y Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 I've never heard of cwnn after 1♥-1♠ have you?!maybe we can call it gadget with no name? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 I've never heard of cwnn after 1♥-1♠ have you?!fwiw, I haven't either.I thought it is only for a 1-minor open >> 1-Major response, but I suppose with prior agreement you could have:1H - 1S4H! = 4s/6h, GF values....but I'm afraid this situation is rare compared to long, strong Ht hands which lack Spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts