Another high-level decision

[Valardent]

Partner could have bid 3♣ on 1♥ showing ♠+♦ regardless of strength (at least equivalent of an opening hand)

 

2♠ : shows ♥fit, invite or better

 

dbl : ♠ feature (A,K or Q)

 

rdbl : alerted as the Ace

 

5♣: 1 Ace out of 5

 

 

 

[hv=pc=n&s=sq76h43d5cjt97543&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=p1h1s2sdr4d4np5c5d6h]133|200[/hv]

[gnasher]

Pass, because my holdings in partner's suits don't suggest bidding, and defensive values don't suggest doubling.

[Fluffy]

We have more spades than expected but that's all, with some luck the ace missing is ♦A

[mfa1010]

DBL. I try the lightner (they bid a voluntary slam so it is lightner). Can't make dull bids every time.

Partner will be confused when I follow to the diamond, but hopefully he continues the suit whatever red ace he has.

[mfa1010]

Btw I think that double of 2♠ is better played as a spade raise.

[whereagles]

Can I trust partner to have his bids? If so, I expect some weakish wierd 66 or 75 and would save in 6♠.

 

If I can't, pass is 110% obvious.

[nige1]

[hv=pc=n&s=sq76h43d5cjt97543&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=p1h1s2sdr4d4np5c5d6h]133|200|Partner could have bid 3♣ on 1♥ showing ♠+♦ regardless of strength (at least equivalent of an opening hand)

2♠ : shows ♥fit, invite or better

dbl : ♠ feature (A,K or Q)

rdbl : alerted as the Ace

5♣: 1 Ace out of 5[/hv]

IMO _P = 10, _X = 5, 6♠ = 4.

[JLOGIC]

I'm sure I would have passed and awaited partners DA lead, it is very likely he has it since the opps did not try for a grand (so they're off 1 keycard) and we know they have the SA. MFAs double is pretty sexy though.

[Valardent]

This was it :

 

[hv=pc=n&s=sq76h43d5cjt97543&w=sa4hqj875d987ckq2&n=skj9832hdaj432c86&e=st5hakt962dkqt6ca&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=p1h1s2sdr4d4np5c5d6hppp]399|300[/hv]

 

a dbl would have help p to find the ♦ lead & continuation to set it.

[JLOGIC]

I don't think partner needs any help when he has that hand.