Phil Posted December 17, 2010 Report Share Posted December 17, 2010 Decent red game at IMPs (especially from North) with the opening bid but notice there isn't a lot wasted, and we have a nine card fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduran1216 Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 2♠. Restart discussions about the American vs European versions interpretations of 3♠ please. Even if I played 3♠ to be 5 spades + an invite, I can't believe this is the right hand for it. Can you build a hand for partner that you don't like your chances in 4S? I tried and failed without constructing an awful takeout hand. Will partner raise you or even make a try with QJxxxAJxxKxxx Guess Adam beat me to it by posting the actual hand haha. Well as mentioned, its still a good game, and assuming u start by cashing a high spade from P hand and catching a stiff J or Q, which seems at least a little likely, then u avoid the spade loser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 Can you build a hand for partner that you don't like your chances in 4S? I tried and failed without constructing an awful takeout hand. OK I'm timing myself.... Kxx xx Axxx AJxx That took 20 seconds. Yeah I can come up with some hands where game is good, but in most cases partner is moving over 2♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduran1216 Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 OK I'm timing myself.... Kxx xx Axxx AJxx That took 20 seconds. Yeah I can come up with some hands where game is good, but in most cases partner is moving over 2♠. Well I'm old fashioned, so take a diamond away and replace with a spade. Still not good, but I'd say this hand will make 4S most of the time in this set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 Will partner raise you or even make a try with QJxxxAJxxKxxxHe probably should do. If you would make a takeout double on QJxx xx AJx Kxxx or QJxx xxx AJx KQx, you have to bid more when you're dealt a traditional takeout double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduran1216 Posted December 18, 2010 Report Share Posted December 18, 2010 He probably should do. If you would make a takeout double on QJxx xx AJx Kxxx or QJxx xxx AJx KQx, you have to bid more when you're dealt a traditional takeout double.. Right so this becomes an agreement thing. I would never EVER make a takeout dbl with the last one, and if partner is unpassed I'm not doubling with the first either. Makes hand evaluating a bit easier, and u just have to use judgement when balancing. Playing OBAR keeps us from being in trouble. So if it goes 1H p 2H partner is expected to bid 2S with that hand, and now I can raise after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tolvyrj Posted December 25, 2010 Report Share Posted December 25, 2010 2S is obvious i think. We dont yet know much bout pards hand. He/She may be keeping bidding alive with some sort of 3 suiter or he/she may have some strong hand with or without spades; too good for just an overcall on first round. Its true that our hand cant be much better for 2S bid, but it aint too strong for it either. If there is something else to do in this hand prd will keep on bidding; and there is bonus possibility that opps will keep on bidding they H...slurppp:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted December 26, 2010 Report Share Posted December 26, 2010 I think people bidding 2♠ on a style where it is allowed to have 5 cards are underbidding, because the 4th heart is very powerful card. If partner happens to have 4 spades and we can avoid overruffs, even if partner has 2 hearts it will be very similar to having a 7222 shape opposite 12-14 balanced with 2 spades. And that kind of hand makes game with much less than 24 HCP combined. Maybe those are too many ifs, but there is also the possible bonus of a stiff heart in partners hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_dude Posted December 29, 2010 Report Share Posted December 29, 2010 I think both 2♠ and 4♠ are fine, depending on how aggressive your takeout doubles are. 3♠ as anything but preemptive makes no sense to me. How many invitational bids do you need? I mean .. assuming 2♠ is 9-11ish, and you are going to bid 4♠ with any opening hand (or 2♥ with a good hand but 4card suit) .. then when would you ever want to bid 3♠? Unless of course you have a bad hand with six spades and want to jam the auction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 2♥ then 3♠ would have shown the hand I think. Bidding 4♠ over 2 would show a perfect hand like: [hv=pc=n&n=sa5432ha632dq42c2]133|100[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.