InTime Posted December 13, 2010 Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 [hv=pc=n&w=shak543djcaqjt962&e=skqt42hqj86dat3ck]266|100[/hv]North/South keeps quiet throughout the auction.Playing 2/1, how do you bid this hand to it's full conclusion?East opens 1♠, EW Vul.Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted December 13, 2010 Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 If I start with 2♣ it will be very very easy: ---1♠2♣-2♥3♥-4♣ (No spade cuebid where partner might have shortness, no shortness cuebid where partner is long, this means that 4♣ must be ♣K and no ♠A allowing blackwood later)4♦-4♠4NT-1 ace♥Q?-yes with ♠K7♥ However I might start with 2♥, hard to tell, I never had a 7-5 hand as responder so I can't tell you objetivelly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted December 13, 2010 Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 I can't improve on Da Fluster's . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted December 13, 2010 Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 Close to fluffy's, but I think he has an unnecessary step: 1♠ 2♣2♥ 3♥4♣ 4N The only judgment issue is the choice of 4♣ as the cue. I am a strong believer that the first cue in partner's suit is always strength-based, not length-based. I would never make my first cue on a stiff or void in partner's suit, and this hand is a classic example of why. If we allow West to draw the inference that the club cue denies the spade A, as I think it has to, then why waste time with a meaningless 4♦ cue? The only question we have at the point of 4♣, is whether partner holds the heart Q....I mean we'd like to know if he has 5 hearts or the J as well, but we can't find out anyway....the heart Q makes us at least 68% for the grand...so haul out keycard. BTW, the idea of responding 2♥ to 1♠ makes me feel quite ill. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted December 13, 2010 Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 I'd duplicate Mike's auction I think -- The choice not to cue 3♠ might be a bit difficult for me, however even if E were to do so, I think they could still find the grand via Exclusion (4♠ over 3♠ should be ERKC) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted December 13, 2010 Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 I'd duplicate Mike's auction I think -- The choice not to cue 3♠ might be a bit difficult for me, however even if E were to do so, I think they could still find the grand via Exclusion (4♠ over 3♠ should be ERKC)I don't know if the Meckwell agreement applies to this auction when 1S is responded, but when Hts are agreed, 4S! = kickkback RKC for Hts and 4NT! becomes Voidwood for Hts, excluding the Sp Ace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.