el mister Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Playing Acol with a pickup partner, who makes a direct overcall of opps suit at the 4 level, over my passed hand.Is there a standard meaning for this bid? Wasnae sure what it meant, maybe both majors and a lot of strength, so thought 4♥best in the circumstances. [hv=pc=n&s=s6ha964dqt43cqt42&n=sakqj97532h3d7c83&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=p1d4dd4hd4sdppp]266|200[/hv] As you can see, p held monstrous spades. Is this sort of cue commensurate with his hand? And does it imply a single ♦? Or is it just nonsense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Playing Acol with a pickup partner, who makes a direct overcall of opps suit at the 4 level, over my passed hand.Is there a standard meaning for this bid? I would take it as natural and preemptive. As you can see, p held monstrous spades. Is this sort of cue commensurate with his hand? And does it imply a single ♦? Or is it just nonsense? It's just nonsense. Your partner has an easy 4♠ bid. The only alternatives are 1♠ and double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Common (1m)-4m styles are 1. natural, preemptive2. 66 majors3. a good 4M overcall Pard seems to be playing option 3, but this is the sort of stuff you don't do at table without previous discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Common (1m)-4m styles are 1. natural, preemptive2. 66 majors3. a good 4M overcall Pard seems to be playing option 3, but this is the sort of stuff you don't do at table without previous discussion. Option 3 would certainly need some definition, I mean what is the difference to doubling and then bidding 4M for instance? But what I would like to emphasize here is that, opposite a passed hand, your chances of making a slam with this hand are nonexistent (does your partner pass with 3 aces?), and therefore there is no reason to bid anything other than 4♠, no matter what your (non)agreement about the double-jump-cue may be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Option 3 would certainly need some definition, I mean what is the difference to doubling and then bidding 4M for instance? But what I would like to emphasize here is that, opposite a passed hand, your chances of making a slam with this hand are nonexistent (does your partner pass with 3 aces?), and therefore there is no reason to bid anything other than 4♠, no matter what your (non)agreement about the double-jump-cue may be.I'd say the point was to get indisciplined opponents to double his final contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Option 3 would certainly need some definition, I mean what is the difference to doubling and then bidding 4M for instance? well, you could perhaps agree on 1m 4M: offensive preempt.1m 4m: offensive preempt, with some defensive values. Similar to a namyats opening.1m dbl + 4M: long suit, defensive values. Not at all encouraging to 5M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 [ ] commensurate with his hand[ ] implies singleton diamond[x] nonsense 4♦ should be 6-6 in the majors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el mister Posted December 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Thanks all. Whilst we're on the subject, what would 1♦ 3♦ mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Thanks all. Whilst we're on the subject, what would 1♦ 3♦ mean? I think the standard meaning would be asking for a stopper, presumably with running clubs. "Natural and preemptive" is a perfectly fine alternative meaning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Whole lotta diamonds. If you want to play it as a 6M-6M, knock yourself out. Some play NAMYATS overcalls, which fits pard's hand. 9 solid spades isn't really a 4♠ call, but its hardly a misdescription either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Thanks all. Whilst we're on the subject, what would 1♦ 3♦ mean?I play 1m-3m as Natural and Pre-emptive.1m-4m is 6-6 in the Majors (or Pre-emptive if undiscussed)1M-3M is a stopper ask, with a long running suit.1M-4M is natural and to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l milne Posted December 8, 2010 Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 Your partner has an easy 4♠ bid. The only alternatives are 1♠ and double. ... or pass, or 1NT, or 1♥, or 2♥, 2♠, 3♠... also, agree with gwnn, although nat preempt is my preference over 1♦ could be as short as 3 (or less) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted December 10, 2010 Report Share Posted December 10, 2010 Thanks all. Whilst we're on the subject, what would 1♦ 3♦ mean?The typical meaning is to ask for a stopper, typically with running clubs. Common alternatives are natural, or a strong hand with both majors (allowing you to take this hand type out of your 2D overcall). I would expect 1m - (4m) to be an extreme hand with both majors absent any firm agreement (but would avoid making such a bid myself). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewleongusa Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Playing Acol with a pickup partner, who makes a direct overcall of opps suit at the 4 level, over my passed hand.Is there a standard meaning for this bid? Wasnae sure what it meant, maybe both majors and a lot of strength, so thought 4♥best in the circumstances. [hv=pc=n&s=s6ha964dqt43cqt42&n=sakqj97532h3d7c83&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=p1d4dd4hd4sdppp]266|200[/hv] As you can see, p held monstrous spades. Is this sort of cue commensurate with his hand? And does it imply a single ♦? Or is it just nonsense? If a bid is undiscussed and if the bid could be natural than it is natural. Eric Leong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted December 25, 2010 Report Share Posted December 25, 2010 As usual, this type of unusual auction varies a lot by location.In Acol countries, 95% of people would not have discussed this, but the idea of a direct cue bid (at any level) being natural is pretty much unknown.The only meaning I've seen actually agreed and played is to show a good 4major overcall (which is clearly what this player meant it as). It's a long way from being 'standard' though, I'm just saying I've not seen other meanings. I play 4m this way, and the differences in the meanings are - immediate 4M overcall fairly random, pre-emptive- double then bid the major very strong (double then jump to 4M doesn't really exist, double then jump to 3M is forcing showing Acol 2+ values)- 4m overcall is a good 4M overcall i.e. one more or less expecting to make; partner is invited to bid on with values, even without a huge fit, or to double with some defence, or to move with slam interest. This gives a balance between pre-empting and getting extra values over. As others says, a bit like a NAMYATS opening. It doesn't come up very often, but comes up more often than other suggested meanings (by contrast, I don't play NAMYATS because a natural 4m pre-empt is too useful) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts