paulg Posted December 4, 2010 Report Share Posted December 4, 2010 Having lost by one imp in the final, the Neapolitan Club is reporting that Angelini's team has now been disqualified as three of the team did not meet the residential requirements - full story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted December 4, 2010 Report Share Posted December 4, 2010 Hubris, imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted December 4, 2010 Report Share Posted December 4, 2010 I don't know the meaning of hubris, can anyone help? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downagain Posted December 4, 2010 Report Share Posted December 4, 2010 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Hubris 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 4, 2010 Report Share Posted December 4, 2010 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define:hubris FYP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted December 4, 2010 Report Share Posted December 4, 2010 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Hubris Never seen that before LOVE IT! Really need to start using it at work...(Especially when the Application Engineers asks nonsensical questions) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Hubris, imo I do understand what hubris means, but I don't understand what you mean. Who do you think was displaying it, the team that played ineligible players, or the team that filed the challenge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Seems like a double shot, really. Eligibility should be verified/challenged prior to the first round, not after you're unhappy with a result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Don't understand. Why hubris? Why did it take so long to make a decision? Are there residence qualifications? Are they unclear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 I do understand what hubris means, but I don't understand what you mean. Who do you think was displaying it, the team that played ineligible players, or the team that filed the challenge? I'd guess kfay is implying that the team that was DQed was aware of a regulation, disregarded it thinking they could strongarm/sweettalk/wiggle their way out of whatever problems arose? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 I'd guess kfay is implying that the team that was DQed was aware of a regulation, disregarded it thinking they could strongarm/sweettalk/wiggle their way out of whatever problems arose?Precisely. I mean... how can you have a captain with such a record as well as some of the top bridge players in the world and not be aware of the rules for the competition in which you are playing? To me it seems that Angelini likely was aware or suspected but who would put up a fuss over having such an exciting team in the competition as well as challenge one of the 2 most powerful bridge personalities in Italy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 I dont expect teams to be able to know when or when not to challenge other teams qualifications for an event before the first round. That is an unreasonable burden to put on the other teams. If you dont do it before the first round it is too late, that is unreasonable. --- As a side note in the USA in some sports teams have lost their Nat championship months or a year later after the fact because of ineligible players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulg Posted December 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Fantoni, who was in the Angelini team, made some comments on the affair near the end of an interview with the same magazine. For nige1's benefit, the background to the complaint and at least one reason for delay (it was eventually given to the Italian Olympic Committee by the bridge authorities) is covered in a previous post on the Neapolitan Club site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Fantoni, who was in the Angelini team, made some comments on the affair near the end of an interview with the same magazine. For nige1's benefit, the background to the complaint and at least one reason for delay (it was eventually given to the Italian Olympic Committee by the bridge authorities) is covered in a previous post on the Neapolitan Club site. wow...excellent...ty for link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted December 5, 2010 Report Share Posted December 5, 2010 Fantoni, who was in the Angelini team, made some comments on the affair near the end of an interview with the same magazine. For nige1's benefit, the background to the complaint and at least one reason for delay (it was eventually given to the Italian Olympic Committee by the bridge authorities) is covered in a previous post on the Neapolitan Club site. Thanks Paul. It seems the teams behaved faultlessly. Administrators must make quicker decisions, in such cases. It is ridiculous and unfair on everybody to wait until the competition is over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossoneri Posted December 6, 2010 Report Share Posted December 6, 2010 Quite curious as to what happened then, if Fantoni claimed that the organisers assured them that there was no problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulven Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Just got back from Orlando. Discussed this with Fantoni at length. They asked the Federation well before the event and got an email back confirming participation was ok. What else can you do? You ask, it's ok, you play - and you get disqualified...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 9, 2010 Report Share Posted December 9, 2010 Just got back from Orlando. Discussed this with Fantoni at length. They asked the Federation well before the event and got an email back confirming participation was ok. What else can you do? You ask, it's ok, you play - and you get disqualified...? So how does Italian nat. bridge org. respond...or are they silent? Even more important I assume that everyday italian bridge players own/control italy bridge...what are they doing....silent?? nothing?? The owners/members of Italy bridge need to step up and take control or take full blame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.