bd71 Posted November 23, 2010 Report Share Posted November 23, 2010 Playing 2/1 with an infrequent partner. No specific agreements on defense against their NT interference, but you specifically would NOT assume any Lebensohl or related methods with this partner. What is/should be the standard meaning of the doubles in this sequence? 1N* - (2♥)** - X - (2♠)P - P - X *15-17**55 majors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted November 23, 2010 Report Share Posted November 23, 2010 Penalty- The first double said penalty of one or both majors and second said I can penalise this major. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulg Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 To be honest I never know and am always guessing. Generally if my partner is not a strong player then it is more likely to be penalties. If it is a Scottish woman then it is most likely takeout than penalty (not a sexist or racist comment, they were all taught the same mantra for these situations). My guess for stronger players is that they tend to play for penalties when over the bid and more takeout when under. In summary, I try not to double in this situation in pick-up games! I realise that this is not very helpful http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 Hi, The first X could be penalty of T/O, standard was for a long time penalty, but T/Oget more popular. If the first was penalty, the second one is penalty as well.If the first was for T/O, the second one is for T/O as well. NT can look at his major suit holding and can make an eduucated guess, which will bequite ok most of the time. For whats it worth - I prefer the double to be for T/O. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurpoa Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 Fully agree with cloa Penalty- The first double said penalty of one or both majors and second said I can penalise this major. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 The first can be pretty much everything, the second is clearly penalty imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 The first one is whatever you have agreed for it to be, penalty, takeout, or cards. There are only the minors to take out into, surely we don't plan on playing in a major opposite known 5-5 majors. As to Lebensohl, nearly everybody advanced and up plays it and will so assume without agreement. Regardless of what the first double was, the second is penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted November 24, 2010 Report Share Posted November 24, 2010 The first one is whatever you have agreed for it to be, penalty, takeout, or cards. There are only the minors to take out into, surely we don't plan on playing in a major opposite known 5-5 majors. As to Lebensohl, nearly everybody advanced and up plays it and will so assume without agreement. Regardless of what the first double was, the second is penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.