multi over 1S?

[straube]

deleted

[gwnn]

you mean

 

1♠(limited) - 2♦=very weak raise to 2♠ OR signoff in 2♥? sounds cool :)

[Flameous]

I prefer multi over 1♦.

 

1♦ - 2♦ WJS in either major, NF.

 

For that multi over 1♠ I'd also add some strong options.

[straube]

you mean

 

1♠(limited) - 2♦=very weak raise to 2♠ OR signoff in 2♥? sounds cool :)

 

I was going to make it invitational actually to cater to 6H inv or 2S inv hands, but opener has to react quite differently to both

[MickyB]

1S:1N, 2C:2D as multi works well.

[WellSpyder]

1S:1N, 2C:2D as multi works well.

...unless you want to be able to play in 2♦....

[gnasher]

I overcall 4♣ over your multi. Now what?

[gwnn]

gnasher don't you play that 1M-p-2C is either limit raise or balanced GF or GF with a minor? :)

[gnasher]

gnasher don't you play that 1M-p-2C is either limit raise or balanced GF or GF with a minor? :)

 

No, I play it as balanced invitational without 3-card support, FG balanced, or FG with a minor. 4-card limit raises bid 1M-2NT; 3-card limit raises bid 1M-[2M-1]. 3-card game-forcing raises do bid 1M-2♣.

 

The 2♣ response is still a bit vulnerable to preemption, but at least all the hand-types are strong enough for us to be safe at the four-level.