fuburules3 Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Suppose the bidding goes 1D-P-1S-P2D-P-2S How strong of a hand does 2S show? Does it show more than minimal strength or is it suggesting a better place to play? Is the 2D bidder allowed to move towards game after 2S? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 This is a good one to discuss with a regular partner, but with a pickup partner I would assume a minimum with 6 (or 5 very good) spades. Opener might still have 15-16 and with, say, Qx in spades he is certainly allowed to make another move here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Yup, with a maximum and 2 (or 3, depending on your style) good spades. 2♠ is not a unilateral decision saying "I want to play here, I don't care what you have." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuburules3 Posted November 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Yup, with a maximum and 2 (or 3, depending on your style) good spades. 2♠ is not a unilateral decision saying "I want to play here, I don't care what you have." What caused discontent with this bidding sequence when it came up is that one partner thought bidding on should not be allowed (except with spade support) and other partner disagreed. Would you have bid 2D with xKxxAKQJxxQxx If so, would you have bid on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyman Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 What caused discontent with this bidding sequence when it came up is that one partner thought bidding on should not be allowed (except with spade support) and other partner disagreed. Would you have bid 2D with xKxxAKQJxxQxx If so, would you have bid on? yes, no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Yes, I'd pass 2♠ now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Without prior agreement, this should show 6 - 10 HCP. Opener can of course try for game with a fitting hand, like:[hv=pc=n&n=skt7h6dakt962ca75]133|100[/hv] In a regular partnership, the range will be smaller and depend on the meaning of 1♦ - 2♠. Two recommended meanings for this bid are either 5 - 8 HCP or 9 - 11 HCP with a 6-card suit. The sequence 1♦ - 1♠ - 2♦ - 2♠ would then show the range that is not shown by the jump bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 playing nothing spacial 2♠ should normally be the final contract, only move on with fit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 Hi, partnership agreement, but assuming standard, 2S showes a 6 carder and amin responding hand 6-10, and of course opener can make a slam try, if the 2S revealed a fit, than he may reevaluate his hand. If you happen to play weak jump shifts, than usually 2S showes a stronger hand than in standard - it could even show a inv. hand 10-12 with 6 spades. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 What caused discontent with this bidding sequence when it came up is that one partner thought bidding on should not be allowed (except with spade support) and other partner disagreed. Would you have bid 2D with xKxxAKQJxxQxx If so, would you have bid on? 2D is ok, for some, the hand would be strong enough for 3D, but2D is ok, now you have to pass, the 2S bid did not make your handstronger, and 2S showes a 6 carder. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 In traditional bidding (or at least as I learnt it) 1♦ - 1♠2♦ - 2♠ 2♠ was (very slightly) constructive, and opener could move on a suitable hand - usually an absolute maximum, good controls and a doubleton spade As others have said, some people play an immediate 2S response as showing this sort of hand (about 4-8 with 6 spades), and hence for them 2S here is very constructive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 For me it is not constructive at all, opener will bid only very rarely. The hands that some of the people bid 2D on here are amazing, the 15-count with a solid 6-card suit is way too strong for my taste, and Gerben's 14-count has turned into a gameforce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 The hands that some of the people bid 2D on here are amazing, the 15-count with a solid 6-card suit is way too strong for my taste, and Gerben's 14-count has turned into a gameforce. Maybe you are just too used to playing Gazzilli or Riton. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 For me it is not constructive at all, opener will bid only very rarely. The hands that some of the people bid 2D on here are amazing, the 15-count with a solid 6-card suit is way too strong for my taste, and Gerben's 14-count has turned into a gameforce slam try. FYP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts