dboxley Posted November 17, 2010 Report Share Posted November 17, 2010 That's because most Americans are stupid. I resemble that remark! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted November 18, 2010 Report Share Posted November 18, 2010 Last weekend I saw all of the following (which all included opening 1C with 4-5+ in the minors): Open 1D with 4 diamonds, otherwise 1COpen 1C with all weak NTs, including with 5 diamonds, open 1D with 4 diamonds and 18-19 balancedOpen 1C with all balanced hands without a 5-card non-club suitOpen 1D with 4 diamonds, otherwise 1C, but open 1C with 18-19 4-4 minorsOpen 1D with 4 diamonds 12-14 balanced, otherwise 1C (but open 1D with 5 of them) there may have been some more minor variants, I may have lost track Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted November 18, 2010 Report Share Posted November 18, 2010 I resemble that remark! I don't understand how you can resemble a remark. Did you mean to say that you resemble most Americans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted November 18, 2010 Report Share Posted November 18, 2010 I don't understand how you can resemble a remark. Did you mean to say that you resemble most Americans? This is a playful reply used instead of the more often expected "I resent that remark" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustinst22 Posted November 18, 2010 Report Share Posted November 18, 2010 One popular (but minority) variation is sort of the opposite of 'better minor': "if you intend to rebid 1NT, open the suit you don't want led against your notrump contract." It's not quite an agreement to always open your worse minor - you still open the longer if they are unequal - but it's a different way of breaking ties with equal length. Since you will be disclosing this information to your opponents, what advantage does this gain? Now you have announced your weaker suit to the opposition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
campboy Posted November 18, 2010 Report Share Posted November 18, 2010 Since you will be disclosing this information to your opponents, what advantage does this gain? Now you have announced your weaker suit to the opposition.It gains because they don't know whether you have equal length -- and if you don't you have opened your better minor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted November 19, 2010 Report Share Posted November 19, 2010 We eat kangaroos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted November 19, 2010 Report Share Posted November 19, 2010 Open your mind peach. There's a whole world of different flavors out there. You can try Italian pasta or English scones. You can even go to Australia and eat whatever it is that they eat there. Just don't get grumpy like the Hog, or lose your sense of humor. Of course there are different flavors here as well as elsewhere. You stated what standard is. I didn't agree it is standard, that's all, trust me you will notice when/if I am grumpy :) PS. For those who play SAYC, the writeup says 4-4 = normally 1D, 3-3 = normally 1C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11romeo Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 better minor is the way to show partner strength and compostion of the handi prefer 1!C even with 2 cards !C to show a 4 cards major1!D even is showing also a 4 cards major, but i must have 4 cards !D at least to open 1!D1 !C could be a strong hand (16+) with a singletone in a major or the other minor that unable to open ntupon agreement with partner, 1!C is always unpassable1!D is passable with points less than the agreed repondable handopening a minor doesnt mean responder must only reply the major like if i open 1!C, responder 1!D means limited hand, propable 1 major suit 4 cards, but not promising game on the usual opener hand (11-14) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 My current f2f partner opens 1C when he is 4-4. I open 1D with the same hand. I realize that partners are suppose to play an agreed upon system but neither of us is prepared to give way on this. I can call Rosenberg/Zia to my defense if arrested. In "Bridge, Zia and me", MR discusses their minor suit openings which, especially on the Zia side, seem very individualistic. Several years ago I played at a rubber bridge club where the bidding system was stipulated. You were required to open (if you opened in a suit and did not have five of anything) with the lowest ranking four card suit. This included majors. It made for a weird game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
campboy Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 The law which covers both partners being required to play the same methods is 40B2a, which says "such a regulation must not restrict style and judgement, only method". I think this is a style difference so ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted November 27, 2010 Report Share Posted November 27, 2010 The normal thing to do in Norway (where most peaople don't play 5cM) is to open 1♣ with 3-3 and 4-4 and else open the longest. Some open 1♣ on all balanced hand outside their 1NT range, making 1♦ unbalanced and 5+/4441 (a few open 1♣ even on 4441). In one partnership I open all 11-14 balanced hands 1♣, and all 18-19 balanced hands 1♦ (1M with 5cM), making both minor suit openings 2+. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.