mtvesuvius Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 (edited) [hv=pc=n&s=sak64hdakt943ca62&n=sqj93hkj953dck987&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1hp2dp2sp3sp4sp4np5d(0/3)p5h(Q%20ask)p6c(Yes%2C%20cK)p7sppp]266|200|Trump lead to the Ten and Jack, plan the play.[/hv] Edited October 31, 2010 by mtvesuvius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 [hv=pc=n&s=sak64hdakt943ca62&n=sqj93hkj953dck987&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1hp2dp2sp3sp4sp4np5d(0/3)p5h(Q%20ask)p6c(Yes%2C%20cK)p7sppp]266|200|Trump lead to the Ten and Jack, plan the play.[/hv] Assuming NS play a style where NORTH can open his hand, and play a style where the 2♠ bid does not show extra's, one has to fault South, as he forced to the grand slam. However, that is two huge "assumings". So i am going to blame North, not so much for the 1♥ bid, but perhaps he should soft pedal with a 2♥ rebid, or maybe, just maybe, it is no ones fault. For the play, I play a club to dummy, ruff a diamond, ruff a heart, ruff a diamond, play spade to AK. My hope is that the same West has four or five clubs and the heart ACE, and the diamond QJ fall in four rounds, and spades are 3-2. Then i have a club-heart simple squeeze on WEST for 13 tricks (4♦, 2♦-ruffs, 4♠, 2♣ plus the squeeze). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 Even if North's bids were within partnership understanding, South can't be faulted, so there's not fault for bidding. I also am playing for 3-2 spades, 4-3 diamonds, West with ♥A and 4+ clubs, but I came up with a diffent (maybe inferior) order. ♠J. ♦A, ♦K, ♦ruff, ♣A, ♦ruff(high per-force), ♠A, ♠K, ♦T, ♦9. When I cash the last ♠, West cannot hold ♥A and two ♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 Bradley, your partner might draw attention to you when you lead from the wrong hand at trick 2, but if it works well, you'll have a nice story to tell. I would do the same as inquiry, just my timing would be a bit different, starting ruffing a heart and cashing ♦AK, probably doesn't make any difference, but seems to give some extra options if ♦QJ are tight of ♥A stiff or something wild. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 I would do the same as inquiry, just my timing would be a bit different, starting ruffing a heart and cashing ♦AK, probably doesn't make any difference, but seems to give some extra options if ♦QJ are tight of ♥A stiff or something wild.That works when someone has ♦QJx too - when you find out that your diamonds are good, you just take another heart ruff and draw trumps from North. (But maybe that's what you meant.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 [hv=pc=n&s=sak64hdakt943ca62&n=sqj93hkj953dck987&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1hp2dp2sp3sp4sp4np5d(0/3)p5h(Q%20ask)p6c(Yes%2C%20cK)p7sppp]266|200|Trump lead to the Ten and Jack, plan the play.[/hv]I'll let others plan the play.I'll just showcase my method for 1H openers and a 2m! GF.Note the given auction:1H - 2D!2S :: how do you distinguish between a minimum Opener or "extras" w/4s ? With my "home grown" method ( at least I know Zel will appreciate ):1H - 2D!2H!( minimum w or w/o 4s ) - 2S! (asks which?)??..2NT! = no 4s, but may have extra Ht length )..3C! = 4s/5h, Cl shortness..3D! = 4s/5h, Diam shortness )..3H! = 4 5 2 2..3S! = 4s/6+h, ergo shortness in a minor After3D! - 3S 4C ( courtesy cue ) - 4D ( cue )4S - 5C ( cue and must at least have trump A & K to go past 4NT-RKC )5D ( stiff dA or void ) - 6S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Note: if Opener had "extras", he rebids a direct 2S! or 2NT!:1H - 2m!??..2S! = 4s + extras..2NT! = no 4s, extras, but couldn't open 1NT w/5+h. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 I'll let others plan the play.I'll just showcase my method for 1H openers and a 2m! GF.Note the given auction:1H - 2D!2S :: how do you distinguish between a minimum Opener or "extras" w/4s ? With my "home grown" method ( at least I know Zel will appreciate ):1H - 2D!2H!( minimum w or w/o 4s ) - 2S! (asks which?)??..2NT! = no 4s, but may have extra Ht length )..3C! = 4s/5h, Cl shortness..3D! = 4s/5h, Diam shortness )..3H! = 4 5 2 2..3S! = 4s/6+h, ergo shortness in a minor After3D! - 3S 4C ( courtesy cue ) - 4D ( cue )4S - 5C ( cue and must at least have trump A & K to go past 4NT-RKC )5D ( stiff dA or void ) - 6S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Note: if Opener had "extras", he rebids a direct 2S! or 2NT!:1H - 2m!??..2S! = 4s + extras..2NT! = no 4s, extras, but couldn't open 1NT w/5+h.Although it seems to much less popular than the style where 2S does not show extras, the method where 2S is a reverse is perfectly playable. I am not sure that the complexity here is necessary since the only time you need to ask is when Responder holds 4 spades. Therefore 2S can be natural rather than a relay. Simple is 1H - 2D2H...2S = 4 spades......2N = 5332 and no extras......3C = 4+ clubs without extras......3D = 3 or 4+ diamonds and no extras......3H = 1-suited without a solid suit (or without extras if you play the initial jump as extras, which is possibly more common using this method)......3S = 4 spades, no extras, no splinter (typically 4522)......4m = 4 spades, no extras, splinter You lose the shortness-showing splinter at the 3 level and gain on hands without a spade fit. Within your structure, again I feel there is a small optimisation, namely reversing 3H and 3S. You can then use 3S over 3H as an ask for the shortage. This also has the advantage of being more natural (3H shows extra H length and 3S shows S support without anything else to add). Incidentally, I also found this hand very interesting to bid through since it used some of the less-used sequences of the system (3-suiter followed by a 4-level Q ask). For the play I cannot see many options outside of what has already been posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TWO4BRIDGE Posted November 2, 2010 Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 Thx again, Zel.... I've got work to do... going thru my files for 1H openings that I've compiled over the years and test your suggested system.... ( which looks good on the surface ). I came up with my treatment when an expert posed the question ( on the old MSN Message Board years ago ): How does one distinguish between Opener's hand strength for the following 2/1 auction:1H - 2C!2S Opener hand # 1 (Reverse strength ~17+ hcp )A K Q xA K J x xxx x x Opener hand # 2 ( Flannery type hand ( ~ 12-15 )J x x xA K Q x xQ xx x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - And I also like your suggestion for my system:switching the 3H! and 3S! rebids by Responder over Opener's 2H! = minimum rebid. Will you require royalties if I incorporate it into my system ?( If so, where do I send the checks ? ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted November 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2010 The squeeze line works, but you have to transfer the guard:[hv=pc=n&s=sak64hdakt943ca62&w=st8hqt6dj862ct543&n=sqj93hkj953dck987&e=s752ha8742dq75cqj&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=p1hp2dp2sp3sp4sp4np5d(0/3)p5h(sQ%3F)p6c(Yes%3B%20cK)p7sppp]399|300|Was wondering if there might be any reasonable way to figure out to do that?[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 Will you require royalties if I incorporate it into my system ?( If so, where do I send the checks ? )If you ever win a major prize and my suggestion made the difference you can send me a Euro. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 (edited) [hv=pc=n&s=sak64hdakt943ca62&n=sqj93hkj953dck987&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1hp2dp2sp3sp4sp4np5d(0/3)p5h(Q%20ask)p6c(Yes%2C%20cK)p7sppp]266|200|Trump lead to the Ten and Jack, plan the play.[/hv] Great bidding to an excellent slam :) Having now read the previous posts, I agree that the Fluffy/Gnasher line is much better than my pathetic attempt (now deleted) ♠J, ruff a ♥ (an early guess for RHO). ♦AK, ruff a ♦...If a defender started with ♦QJx then ruff another ♥, Cash ♠AK, cross to ♣K, draw trumps, and claim.Otherwise you can still ruff another diamond and attempt the unlikely round suit squeeze. Edited November 5, 2010 by nige1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.