Jump to content

Best route to +110?


kayin801

  

47 members have voted

  1. 1. Agree with 1D opening?

    • Yes
      19
    • No
      28
  2. 2. Your call after 2S?

    • P
      26
    • 3C
      14
    • Other
      0
    • (obnoxious abstain because 1C is a WTP opening bid)
      7


Recommended Posts

How many Spades do you think partner has?

What percentage of the time do you think he has 6?

 

(If I had to bet, I'd place partner with a 6=4=2=1 hand)

 

I can't fathom pulling what looks to be a 6-1 spade fit at the 2 level in order to play in a 5-2 Diamond fit at the three level. (Yes, I'd like to be able to ruff more Hearts, however, nothing in life is perfect)

 

Good point. The more I consider this, the more I think 2 is better... But unfortunately I don't have 2 days to think before making a bad bid :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there another 2/1 forum at this site? Our general style is 2/1 using losers and cover cards for hand evaluation and trying to limit one bids to 18 HCP. Started using the 2/1 from the Romex book and have been reading Lawrence's 2/1 workbook.

This forum is specifically for SAYC and 2/1 meaning the normal American definition of that. Limited openings using 2/1 responses use the Non-Natural System discussion forum, as do such 'unnatural' systems as Culbertson and Acol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sah2dkj975cajt932&n=skj742hq85dtcq754&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1dp1sp2cp2sppp]266|200[/hv]

 

-150 was not a good MP score after they cashed the A and switched to a trump. Spades might have been 5-1 or something as well, and I'm pretty sure the AQxxx of diamonds was over dummy's suit, but it was ugly.

 

Transition to an ATB if you'd like: who is more of a goon?

 

EDIT: I will add that North after the hand admitted he got greedy looking for a good MP score, so even if you don't agree with his thinking, he was "thinking"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sah2dkj975cajt932&n=skj742hq85dtcq754&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1dp1sp2cp2sppp]266|200[/hv]

 

-150 was not a good MP score after they cashed the A and switched to a trump. Spades might have been 5-1 or something as well, and I'm pretty sure the AQxxx of diamonds was over dummy's suit, but it was ugly.

 

Transition to an ATB if you'd like: who is more of a goon?

 

Hard to tell who deserves more blame:

 

Your partner for rebidding a 5 card Spade suit rather than raising clubs (or even passing)

You for deliberately playing with your partner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opening 1 may work or not work with this holding, but it is certainly not idiotic. If I open 1 I expect that about half the time I'll end up playing 3 in a 5-2 fit, when I could have played 2 in a 6-1, or 3 in a 6-2 or even 6-3. I don't think opening 1 is idiotic, but I'd wait for something like x, Kxx, AKQx, Jxxxx, not the example hand, and even then I'm going to end up in 2 in a 4-2 sometimes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...