Jump to content

What's your call?


Recommended Posts

Pass, ... although you by doing this violate partnership agreement, since

partners pass may be forcing.

 

Your 3S call, showed a hand 15/16-18, partners neg. X, occurring on the

2 level showed +8/9, so it could be argued, that 3S did create a game force,

since our side will have at least 23/24HCP our way.

If you follow this argumant, you may regret your 3S bid.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind the slight stretch to a competitive 3 last time noting a good 6 card suit and red queens that may be useful opposite pards negX.

 

But noting that we stretched we have a very easy pass now. .. neilkaz ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks, all. This board was the subject of a ruling when W, holding the hand given, bid 4 - after partner's incredibly long tank. Despite missing 4 cashing tricks, this was allowed to make by NS, who confessed that they were more disgruntled about defending so badly than about the 4 bid.

 

As director, I needed a poll to decide whether pass was an LA to 4. In the EBU, the rules are that pass must be considered by a significant proportion of players, of whom some might select it: so this one's pretty clear-cut!

 

I'll get everything sorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have passed last time, of course. The 3S bid was an overbid. I pass now.

I think 3 is fair.

 

Partner asked us to bid at the 2-level without anything extra.

 

We have a good six card suit. Which is enough to push to the three-level in competition i think.

 

Bidding 4 is over the top though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also find 3 the normal bid, I don't even feel its an overbid.

 

The player who bid 4 deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can :)

So Fluffy, what do you do with a King, (or an Ace), more? Bid 4 and go off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also find 3 the normal bid, I don't even feel its an overbid.

 

The player who bid 4 deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can :)

So Fluffy, what do you do with a King, (or an Ace), more? Bid 4 and go off?

Well, I suppose it is possible to construct a layout where we have AKJxxx, KQx Qx xx, partner has a neg X and opps have their 2, 3 and 4 bids - but it is getting into the realms of relatively unlikely. Also opposite something like xx ATxx ATxx xxx we at least have chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also find 3 the normal bid, I don't even feel its an overbid.

 

The player who bid 4 deserves a warning and something more. Point him to this thread if you can :)

So Fluffy, what do you do with a King, (or an Ace), more? Bid 4 and go off?

I don't think it's impossible to have a 3S bid with a range that is about an ace wide, i.e. the difference between the weakest possible hand and the strongest possible hand is about an ace. In bridge you can't always have clear-cut ranges like '15-17 balanced' all the time, especially not in competitive auctions.

 

Anyway, I think that this 3S is a slight overbid while a 3S with an ace more would be a slight underbid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...