Jump to content

2-part ATB


dkharty

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=e&v=b&n=sxxhatxxdaqxcakxx&w=sxxxhkqjxxxdxxcxx&e=sktxxhxxdtxxxctxx&s=saqjxhxdkjxxcqjxx]399|300|Scoring: MP

suppose this is the actual hand and the bidding goes

(P)-1-(2)-P

(P)-Dbl-(P)-3[/hv]

 

Doesn't partner leave it in 3, expecting the hand to be more like

 

[hv=d=e&v=b&n=sxxhatxxdaqxcakxx&w=sxxxhkqjxxxdxxcxx&e=sktxxhxxdtxxxctxx&s=saqjxhxdkjxxcqjxx]399|300|Scoring: MP

suppose this is the actual hand and the bidding goes

(P)-1-(2)-P

(P)-Dbl-(P)-3[/hv]

 

Or would this North have taken action over 2? Even if my example hands don't quite demonstrate my point, isn't 3 non-forcing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

suppose this is the actual hand....

 

Doesn't partner leave it in 3, expecting the hand to be more like.....

 

Or would this North have taken action over 2? Even if my example hands don't quite demonstrate my point, isn't 3 non-forcing?

To me, this solves the problem of whether or not you leave the reopening X in or not.

 

Once you decide to pass (over 2), you are forced to stick with that choice and leave the X in as partner will never know you have this much strength. You can't expect to bid now, and reach any reasonable contract.

 

Most would play 3C as showing some values (2N being a weak relay), but it would be nowhere near this strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...