karlson Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 ♠JTxx ♥KJxx ♦AJxx ♣x w/w mp. partner deals p-1♣-x-1♠x-2♣-p-p2♥-p-p-3♣p-p- I think I would have bid 2♠ over 2♣, but this was partner's problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 3♥ seems just about fair. Hope they don't bid 3NT now, which may well make ahah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 1 ♠ is more often a correct call and no bluff, so I would expect bad breaks all around and pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlson Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 This was a hesitation UI hand. I broke tempo before passing 3♣ and partner bid 3♥. I thought his decision was close and that the hesitation clearly suggested bidding, but he thought it was clear to bid. The director let 3♥ stand. I was surprised but obviously didn't complain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONEferBRID Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Pard - opp1 - You - opp2p - 1C - X - 1S ( this could be the common psyche )X ( should show 4 cards Sp ) Continuing:X - 2C - X* ( it was T/O the first time, and it is still for T/O ) Continuing:X - 2C - X* - 3C?? ( now it is partner's problem ) Edit--Or maybe the continuation is:X - 2C - X* - p 2H - p - p - 3C p - p - p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mohitz Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 This was a hesitation UI hand. I broke tempo before passing 3♣ and partner bid 3♥. I thought his decision was close and that the hesitation clearly suggested bidding, but he thought it was clear to bid. The director let 3♥ stand. I was surprised but obviously didn't complain. I think i will bid but pass is clearly a logical alternative imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 3H would certainly be bid by a majority in a poll, but I think it would have to be 90+ percent, and not many of those even considering pass in order to allow 3H. Perhaps in different jurisdictions there are different standards for LA, and my numbers probably aren't right for anywhere, but sticking with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 I would pass. We have no undisclosed values or shape after the initial double, our opponents are already pushed to the 3 level, and they are in a minor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 Pass is definitely a LA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 We have no undisclosed values or shape because a takeout double guarantees 4441? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.