hanp Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 IMPs, none vul xQJ10KJ87xAQJx 1S - 2D2H - 2NT3H - ?? 2D was GF, partner could have jumped to 3H immediately to show a good 5-5. What's your call? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 4♥ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 4♥ likewise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
affe82 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 4 clubs. should be cue. i am good enough to show a slaminterest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 4♥ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayin801 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 I guess I can imagine a couple layouts where 3NT is better than 4♥ (AQJxx, xxxxx, Ax, x or something looks unpleasant on trump leads) but I'm no hero, easy 4♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 4♥, partner has 5 of them, we have a fit, wtp? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I think this is closer than the voting so far, receiving the lead in 3NT will be very important. If we avoid a spade lead in 3NT we are almost home, in 4♥ things can go messy if ruffing spades with QJ10 equals losing trumps. I'd try 3NT at MPs, in IMPs its very clsoe and I have no idea what I'd do at the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 why 3NT at MP and not at IMP? I thought the argument was that at MP 4M is better than 3NT if there is at least 1 trick difference and at IMPs 4M scores better only if there is at least 2 tricks difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 why 3NT at MP and not at IMP? I thought the argument was that at MP 4M is better than 3NT if there is at least 1 trick difference and at IMPs 4M scores better only if there is at least 2 tricks difference. Because missdefences allow you a lot of MPs in 3NT, but there is often a lot less work to do in 4M. Maybe because I am used of weak fields, but scoring 460 when everyone is scoring 420 happens a lot to me. In 3NT people don't wanna score their aces :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted September 24, 2010 Report Share Posted September 24, 2010 I'll go for 3NT, despite the major fit. 9 tricks in NT are probably easier than 10 in hearts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.