Phil Posted September 21, 2010 Report Share Posted September 21, 2010 r/w, IMPs AKx x KQxxx ATxx pass - 1♠ - 1N - dblpass - pass - 2♥ - 3♥dbl - 3♠ - pass - ? So you suspect your RHO might be horsing around some. Had enough? Note: Pass was really nothing; xx would have been a minor suit runout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted September 21, 2010 Report Share Posted September 21, 2010 4♣. 3♣ on the previous round would have been forcing (though transfers would be better), so this is a cue-bid for spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 21, 2010 Report Share Posted September 21, 2010 Keycard, whatever I'm not going to help him since I believe partner shows 6+ spades here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 22, 2010 Report Share Posted September 22, 2010 partner lacks heart stopper or has long spades, both scenarios sound very good. 4NT is the practical bid if you lack sound agreements (like I do), would be my choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 23, 2010 Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 5♥ exclusion, lets beat them with their own tricks :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted September 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 This was the problem of my opponents, not mine, but it was created with a 1N overcall with 2722 and ♥AQJxxxx. They did not solve it as efficiently as the posters here and we gained 13. Counterpart preempted in hearts. @Gnasher - I would not be convinced 3♣ was forcing unless discussed. If so, I agree 3♥ agree spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.