Jump to content

enough for 2/1?


gwnn

Recommended Posts

The variation from the other thread is the vulnerabilities. IMO, it is much too early in the auction to unilaterally decide this hand wants to be in game because of vulnerability and IMP odds. So, to me, there is nothing here which wasn't hashed out in the other thread.

 

Edit: OOPs, couldn't read the auction; got confused by mention of "2/1" in different context; whatever other excuse I can think of :)

 

I don't suppose Gwnn will save me by editing the post to "CHO".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...