fuburules3 Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 [hv=d=w&v=b&s=sxxxxhaq10xxdjxckx]133|100|Scoring: IMP2D-X-P-4H-P-4S-P-?[/hv] A couple questions 1. Do you agree with S bidding up to this point? 2. What to do you bid next? The confusion at the table was whether bidding 4S was natural by a hand that doubled intending to bid spades or whether it was some kind of slam try in hearts. How do you distinguish between the two? Edit: A typo in title, but I can't seem to fix it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 4S is natural and strong, with a good hand for hearts, you can bid 4NT, 5D or 5H instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 Yes I agree. Now I bid 5 Club, a cuebid confirming spades. IF I need a first round control for this cuebid, I would try 5 ♠. 4 ♠ is natural for me, you can define it different, but without a discussion this is 100 % natural. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 Q1) IMO the 4♥ call is viable although 3♦ would be a more flexible alternative Q2) I would assume partner had significant xtras and would raise to 5♠ showing 2♦ losers from my perspective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuburules3 Posted September 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 Thanks for replies. For your amusement, partner had KQxxx void AQ987 AQx and bidding continued 5C-P-6C-P-6H-P-P-X-6S-P-6NT-X-P-P-P Teammates were not impressed ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 That ain't a power double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucky Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Thanks for replies. For your amusement, partner had KQxxx void AQ987 AQx and bidding continued 5C-P-6C-P-6H-P-P-X-6S-P-6NT-X-P-P-P Teammates were not impressed ;) Double with a void in a side suit (let alone a major) is a bad idea. After opp's weak 2, double then bidding own suit ought to show flexibility playing in other strains, since with a good hand and good suit you would jump overcall at proper level. With the actual hand your partner has, I would simply overcall 2♠. I also don't understand the final correction to 6NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 I had understood a double of a two heart opening- as long as you do not play non leaping michaels. But to double 2 ♦ with 5 spades, zero hearts and AQ987 in ♦ is bad even for BI standards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts