Lovera Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 It is sure at this time that the hand is not balanced (i use overbidding opp suit having hands with analog type of distribution of direct overb.(=1♦-2♦) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted August 27, 2015 Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 Well, let's look to get at point from the other side doesn't considering for the moment the 2♦ bidding on second round. The bidding than goes:( p )- 1♣ - (1♦) - 1♥, (p) - 2♠. Now is clear i am on reversed bidding but what hand can i have ? It is normal to think at anything of more usual and probable than a 4 - 5 or also a 4 - 6 spade-club reversed. But it is not so yet about shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted August 28, 2015 Report Share Posted August 28, 2015 It is the last remaining the 5-1-1-6 and to bid so i must have almost 10 points in high cards giving information that the first suit is longer than the second one (i.e. ♠ AKxxx and ♣ AJxxxx). The point is that urge to give at partner the possibility to know i have five cards in spade for a raise with three cards. Because revers with bidding of this type are three (4-5, 4-6 and 5-6) if we can use eventually overbidding of suit of opp after rever meaning its is a max rev. instead inverting the process only for the 5-6 we can focus about shape making rever after overbidding (eventually can be used also for 5-0-2-6 overbidding the suit of opp with two cards reserving it to indicate this rare distribution). Such as if bidding continues so ..2♦-(p)-2♥-(p)-2♠ or 2♦-(3♦)-3♥-(p)-3♠ at partner has arrived the usefull information of five cards in spade (and than six in club).This is my idea to solve this (problematic) bidding because i have not seen/known to have been ever studyied before.Obviously this is possible because opp intervention but lacking it problem seems to remain. How do you think about it ? It is possible to manage this gadget ? Bye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted August 29, 2015 Report Share Posted August 29, 2015 The lonely hand that i've found to understand the bidding problem (similar but stronger) is :S ♠ AK432 ♥ 8 ♦ AKJ874 ♣ A (not vul vs non vul) bidding : 2♣ - 3♣ - p - 5♣ what bidding S at second round ? Reese : it's early to X, 6♦ it is excessive , pass it is not to think risking to hear 5♥; Besse : 5 "karpics" (director come here); Rose: double Monday, Wednesday, Friday and 5♦ Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday (Sunday probably he get to rest and doesn't answer); Jais : double; Chiaradia and Romanet: 5♠; Genevieve Morenas : 6♦; Belladonna :6♣ (spectacolar cue bid). This hand is from World Championship in Buenos Aires and Le Dentu was in S against Leventritt and Schenken (E-O) and bided 6♣. Then Trezel in N bidded 6♠ (with much fear of Le Dentu). Quote : 5♦=100 pass=80 X or 5♠=70 6♦=60 6♣=? Maxima to remember: Don't force your talent when risk can be much big.(From "Bridge a la une" by Jose Le Dentu IL Fear pagg. 220-221). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovera Posted September 1, 2015 Report Share Posted September 1, 2015 It is happened today in MSN club: i seat for the second time at table and see ♠ 92 ♥ AKJ10x ♦ - ♣ QJxxxx (!)(=strange but had i not told that this one is a rare hand ?) Naturally i open with 1 ♣ but bidding don't proceed. Why ? I was courious to see Bots what had bidded to experiment an eventually overbidding of the suit of opp.(En passant : the first time in the same club, open table :seat, when at this other table i see that i had already bidding (when it is not ) and again, after a pass, the bidding was not move. Then i was tried to change requiring an undo with same resulting but anything changed. Why ?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.