jillybean Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 1♣ (X) P (P)1N (P) 2♦ 2♦ natural or systems on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Interesting. I wouldn't be sure but my guess is that my semi reg p would take it as transfer (in both precision or polish c but meaning of this sequence is basically the same there). It seems like very rare sequence because in sayc 2/1 responder should strive to bid 5+card suit at any excuse after 1♣ dbl imo but for sure hands like: xxxQ9xxxxxxxx aren't 1♥ in standard book (I think). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 This is a very weird sequence - 1m - x - p - p; 1N and I wouldn't want to spend much time on follow-ups. Frankly, I'm not sure I've ever seen it at the table. The 1♣ opener gets penalty passed and wants to run to 1N? Usually the 1♣ bidder sits or redoubles / bids for rescue. Perhaps you meant something like 1♣ - (1♥) - p - (p); - 1N or 1♣ - (p) - p - (1♥); - 1N. This is a more common sequence, and I can see using 'system on', but would not consider it standard at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted August 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Phil, the auction is correct. I held a balanced 18-19 hand with 3 clubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Without discussion I would have interpreted it as natural and to play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 1♣ (X) P (P)1N (P) 2♦ 2♦ natural or systems on? of course natural d......with no discussion..... i think nat with discussion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 I think even 1♣ 1♥ p p 1NT p 2♥ should be natural. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Phil, the auction is correct. I held a balanced 18-19 hand with 3 clubs. Kathryn I'm not sure why you aren't xxing for rescue then with his hand type. Surely there's a better spot than 1N if pard has length in a non-club suit. The chances of finding game (which is one of the main reasons for a 1N rebid by opener) are about zip, so safety seems paramount to settling in a high scoring partial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Natural. Ask your self, if you have 5 clubs, what do you want to bid? With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Natural. I understand 1NT rebid as "oversize 1NT" 18-19 balanced. Opener could have bid a major or redoubled with other types of hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Diamonds to play, but it seems like even with 18-19 bal and 3 clubs youre supposed to redouble, 1N is not really a safe bid at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted August 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Ok, thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Get used to use XX as run away in some good described sequences- like this one. Anyway, in a similar situation I would treat 2 ♦ as diamonds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Definitely diamonds, but agree the auction shouldn't really occur. But 1C - p - p - Dbl - 1NT - p - 2D is natural. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucky Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 This is a very weird sequence - 1m - x - p - p; 1N and I wouldn't want to spend much time on follow-ups. Frankly, I'm not sure I've ever seen it at the table. The 1♣ opener gets penalty passed and wants to run to 1N? Usually the 1♣ bidder sits or redoubles / bids for rescue. Perhaps you meant something like 1♣ - (1♥) - p - (p); - 1N or 1♣ - (p) - p - (1♥); - 1N. This is a more common sequence, and I can see using 'system on', but would not consider it standard at all. I think over 1m (1M) P (P) 1NT, it is better to play partner's response as natural. The reason is that you want partner to be able to take you back to 2m, knowing that you have 3+ in the suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucky Posted September 2, 2010 Report Share Posted September 2, 2010 Phil, the auction is correct. I held a balanced 18-19 hand with 3 clubs. Partner is probably very weak, 1NT may not play very well (doubled). Even with 18-19, you will want to get out in a 1-level suit, which is much harder for the opps to double. The way to do this is by XX. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.