fanny4 Posted August 28, 2010 Report Share Posted August 28, 2010 Dummy breaks Law 61 by asking a defender if they have revoked. At the end of the hand the revoke is shown to have occurred, but the unauthorised information has not assisted declarer in any way. Do the revoke Laws still apply or is there any change as a result of dummy's infraction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pran Posted August 28, 2010 Report Share Posted August 28, 2010 Dummy breaks Law 61 by asking a defender if they have revoked. However, at the end of the hand the revoke is shown to have occurred. Do the revoke Laws still apply or is there any change as a result of dummy's infraction? Law 61B2a: Dummy may not ask a defender and Law 16B may apply Dummy's violation of this law has no consequence on the rectification from the revoke, but he may be subject to a procedural penalty and his question gives unauthorized information to declarer who therefore may be subject to restrictions on choosing his line of play thereafter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trecar Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 I agree with Pran Consider Law 62 Correction of a revoke, then if appropriate any penalty under Law 16B. If no PP is appropriate, Dummy should in any event be reminded of his rights & limitations in Laws 42 & 43 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.