OleBerg Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 ...I like simplicity and I like how0NT=w-v1NT=v+1 - x2NT=x+1 - y3NT=y+1 - z4NT=z+1 - u Que? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 I don't like to have a headache whether in case b or case c it makes more or less sense to play quantitative. I just play Quantitative always yay. And in the poll, apparently eight others, of the 38 who voted, agree with you. With all weak NT hands, they will pass 4NT, presumably ---because of the range you give for 4NT -- and strive to get at least 10 tricks. With 18-19 balanced, they will proceed to slam in NT. With all unbalanced hands which might not belong in NT at all, whether weak or stronger, they will have no clue how to continue the search for strain and level. Headache Transfer Convention? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 ...I like simplicity and I like how0NT=w-v1NT=v+1 - x2NT=x+1 - y3NT=y+1 - z4NT=z+1 - u Que? in this case it would be something like 4-78-1011-1213-1617-18 I freely admit that I don't have this sequence well defined with any of my partners, but I know one would take it 100% as quantitative and 1 would take it 0% as quantitative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 Gwnn not quantitative! Why take up all that room when opener has so much more of his shape to describe? How does he know what to do with extra club length? Lots of hands we could have just found a trump suit and started cuebidding. You are making me sad :P sorry for ruining your day jdonn but I like simplicity and I like how0NT=w-v1NT=v+1 - x2NT=x+1 - y3NT=y+1 - z4NT=z+1 - u and more or less the same handtype. obviously not quite but I could construct a certain shape with a certain club holding and adding HCP continuously to the non-club suits, they will go through pass, 1NT, 2NT, 3NT and 4NT. also 1x-1y2z(not a reverse)-4NT3z-4NT 1M-2y2z-4N and so on. I don't like to have a headache whether in case b or case c it makes more or less sense to play quantitative. I just play Quantitative always yay. Simplicity personified? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachy Posted August 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2010 As a followup. This didn't happen at the table, but we discussed it a little and wondered what most would understand it as. Seems that RKC is about 3/4 majority opinion. I would like to see a sequence or some sequences (if any, maybe there really isn't any) that show a quantitative invite after auction starts 1D-1H-1S, when 1D-1H-1S-4NT is RKC for spades. Please ignore the hand I showed in another thread, I am hoping to keep the discussion on the system level, no actual hands. Thanks again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted August 25, 2010 Report Share Posted August 25, 2010 1D-1H1S- 2C2N-4N.......but 17 would be too low. There would be others, I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted August 25, 2010 Report Share Posted August 25, 2010 Also:1D-1H1S-2C2N-3N4N....where opener was temporizing in a GF auction to see where responder was going before showing his own extras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted August 25, 2010 Report Share Posted August 25, 2010 come on jdonn give me a break, I just handle numbers and maths better than English. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.