MFA Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (2♥) - 2NT - (pass)(2♠) - 2NT - (pass) Does anyone have some good system here? For me it is just 2NT-system on, which means stayman + transfer. I just seems so silly with one of the majors already "taken". Particularly I am interested in a structure that would allow us to sign-off in as many suits as possible at the three level (without losing the normal stuff like finding 4-4, 5-3s majors and offering a choice of game with the latter). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I started a thread about this a while back; perhaps someone will link to it. My suggestion is to play everything as a transfer, with transfer to the opponents' suit being stayman. This has the advantage of being simple while getting you an extra three-level signoff and also helping with slam bidding. So: (2♥)-2NT-(Pass): 3♣ = 5+♦3♦ = game-going hand with four spades3♥ = 5+♠3♠ = 5+♣, at least mild slam interest3N = to play (2♠)-2NT-(Pass): 3♣ = 5+♦3♦ = 5+♥3♥ = game-going hand with four hearts (forcing)3♠ = 5+♣, at least mild slam interest3N = to play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 3♣ = 5+♦3♦ = game-going hand with four spades3♥ = 5+♠3♠ = 5+♣, at least mild slam interest ^^ I prefer 3♠ as minors 5+-4+ at least light SI though and 4♣/4♦ as natural slam tries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted August 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Makes good sense. (2♠)-2NT-(p)-3♥ = four hearts is a little annoying because of the potential wrongsiding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Transfers are pretty good. I like to make a slight change that 3♣ is a signoff in any suit and transfering to the other major is invitational+. The disadvantage is when you're strong with diamonds (would have transfered to diamonds then bid again, although you can still bid 3♣ then 3NT (or higher) to show diamonds), but the two advantages are (small) you can bid 3♣ then cuebid for 3 suited short in opener's suit, and (big) you can just invite when invitational with the other major, which is a common and important hand type. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted August 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Ok, also a very good suggestion from jdonn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bb79 Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 I had asked this question before, this was Fred's response .. 3C->3D (see below)3D=Invitational or better with 5+ of the other majorCuebid=Stayman3 of other major=Both minors After 3C->3D: Pass=signoff3 of other major=signoffCuebid=GF with long diamonds3NT=GF with long clubs (not forcing)4C=GF with long clubs (forcing)There is more to it than that, but if you can deal with the above then you can probably work out something sensible for followups sequences and (if you want) for sequences not defined above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.