cloa513 Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 I think it was vulnerable noneSouth opens with 1♠, and it goes Pass, Pass and now to you with♠AKJ♥AQxx♦Qxxxx♣x I went with double as partner is OK with Equal Level Conversion to the diamonds if need be and partner bids quite well so far. Do you agree? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flameous Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 Yes to double but over partners 2C I'm going to bid 2NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 Do you agree? And what exactly was the alternative action ?Easy double especially if 2♦ then doesn't show very strong hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 1NT is a serious alternative imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 Yes to double but over partners 2C I'm going to bid 2NT. this is close for me. 16, then adding a king for being in bal seat. But, then I would probably subtract a bit for the negatives about the hand, and just ELC after double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 1NT is a serious alternative imo. I am used to playing 1NT is ~11-14 in reopening seat so I didn't consider it.Do you prefer other style or do you bid 1NT regardless ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 If 15 is in your range for 1NT then I would bid that. We can always jump to game later when partner bids stayman B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 I would bid 1N. I would view playing a range of 11-14 over 1S p p for 1N as flat out unplayable. I prefer 12-16 over spades but w/e. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 11 to 16 is my range over 1M - p - p and that is my call. Not perfect but x and 2D hardly is either since I do not play ELC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 I would bid 1N. I would view playing a range of 11-14 over 1S p p for 1N as flat out unplayable. I prefer 12-16 over spades but w/e. I am just asking, no strong opinion.At least 2 elite parterships play 11-14 there and it's default in Poland so I would be surprised if it's unplayable but wouldn't be surprised at all if it's inferior.This is rare sequence anyway so w/e. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Think the split X vs 1N should revolve on the other major. X invites the other major; 1N not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I have no problems with the unplayable system (NT 11-14) so far. SO I would double too in the context of ELC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.