gwnn Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 [hv=d=s&v=n&n=sj4haq5dt965cq764&e=s753h82da8742ct53]266|200|Scoring: MP1♣-1♠-x-2♠x-p-3♣-p3NT-p-p-p[/hv] ♠T (standard) lead to the Jacksmall diamond from dummy... opps are unpredictable, they don't know what either double shows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 No, I just can't fly A. I will crash partner's honour too often, and if I do so that trick won't come back. Declarer is likely either 3433 or 3424 and therefore probably has 18-19 and it is all about overtricks. Yes declarer could have ♠AQx and ♦QJ for instance, but I can't win them all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 No, I just can't fly A. I will crash partner's honour too often, and if I do so that trick won't come back. Declarer is likely either 3433 or 3424 and therefore probably has 18-19 and it is all about overtricks. Yes declarer could have ♠AQx and ♦QJ for instance, but I can't win them all. can partner stand the squeeze of ♣s with that holding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 No, I just can't fly A. I will crash partner's honour too often, and if I do so that trick won't come back. Declarer is likely either 3433 or 3424 and therefore probably has 18-19 and it is all about overtricks. Yes declarer could have ♠AQx and ♦QJ for instance, but I can't win them all. can partner stand the squeeze of ♣s with that holdingWell, yes, he will have to discard a spade or two, but 3NT will only make 9 or 10 if I take the ♦A now. If I duck declarer will make 11 tricks. (AQx, Jxxx, QJ, AKJx) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 There are many layouts where declarer is trying to steal 9th trick (2♠ + 4♣ + 2♥ if partner has ♥KT/♥KJ or 2♠ + 3♣ + 3♥ if partner has ♣A/K). Playing A♦ only costs if declarer has ♦KJx and AK of clubs. I think playing A♦ is better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 I'm not scared of partner having ♣K. Either there is no harm done by ducking the diamond or declarer would typically have taken a club finesse instead of playing diamonds. If partner has ♣A, declarer would often have attacked clubs first, and most certainly if he is 3424. ♦A also loses to ♦QJx and ♦KJ. And if declarer doesn't have specifically ♠AQx, going up in diamonds is often pointless. I still think I can't rise with ♦A here, even though it could be right to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Damn shame partner didn't redouble 2♠. Seems like a good situation for a "Smith Echo Double" to me. That said, ducking the Ace is hopeless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONEferBRID Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Why is almost everyone giving Declarer A Q x of ♠;why can't he have K x x ? I too believe Declarer is trying to steal a 9th trick.He may have the K Q of ♦... and hopes West has the ♦A. Fly up with the ♦A and return a ♠ . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted August 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2010 I wasn't sleeping and gave away the contract when I gobbled up my partner's stiff K. Declarer had 3433 (AKx of spades) with 14 points. I told you they were unpredictable ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.