gwnn Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 For me it's 100% 1NT. I also know that partner will basically always bid 2♠ holding 5 of them so it's not like I am missing any 5-3 fits. The problem is not that you miss 5-3 fits, it is that you miss some very nice 4-3 fits and sometimes partner just rebids 2M when he would have tried for/bid game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 So, when you have a hand that is in the middle, you have to compare it to what you consider to be a maximum for the sequence and what you consider to be a minimum for the sequence to figure out where the hand stands. This is not a joke, if I did that my answer would always be: my hand is in the middle. My quick hand comparison gives only 2 answers: beter or worse. I compare my hands with standard ones to come to a conclusion if the hand is good or not. Not that it is really important, but I found it interesting that my thinking approach is completelly different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 my guess is, that you would find more people from Europe raising, if the handwould have a 5431 shape Yes, especially if it's exactly: 3♠ - 4♥ - 5♦ - 1♣ after 1♦ opener or 3♠ - 4♥ - 1♣ - 5♣ after 1♣ opener.Those are the only hands on which I would bid 2M personally. The problem is not that you miss 5-3 fits, it is that you miss some very nice 4-3 fits and sometimes partner just rebids 2M when he would have tried for/bid game. I understand those concerns.I saw too many times American pairs getting owned by themselves in: 1m - 1M2M - 4M auctions getting to 4-3 contract which has no play though. I guess the solution is to use some kind of gadgets but I am big believer in bidding games fast on simple hands and system which produces long auctions on the simplest of hands is not what I like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 If you had asked me a year ago, I would have voted 1NT out of principle and stubbornness. I have come around to bidding 2S with 3 on this type of hand, and ONLY on this type of hand - strong 3-card support, and a small doubleton or worse in an unbid suit, and an extra flaw for each of the alternatives (a second unstopped suit for 1NT, and only AJxxx for 2C.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts