Jump to content

ATB

Hanoi5

By Hanoi5
in Interesting Bridge Hands

 Share

Recommended Posts

ArtK78

ArtK78

Posted
Posted

I understand the knee-jerk reaction to double 3♥, but I would rate the chances of making 3NT opposite a passed partner at slim to none. So then the question is whether the pull to 4♣ shows a big hand.

 

If one forsees this problem, the 4♣ overcall has a lot more going for it than the double. Besides, if partner cannot volunteer spades on his own, it is probably unlikely that 4♠ is going to be a good contract.

 

Pass also has to be considered, given that the partnership has no more than 23 HCP between them. But, as you may be operating with a 30 point deck, 23 HCP may be more than enough to make 10 or 11 tricks in a suit contract.

 

As for West's 3NT call, I don't see what reasonable alternative he has. He has a heart stopper (or so he thinks) and a source of tricks. Surely it is not unreasonable to try for the 9 trick game.

 

I vote 75% to East for an ill-conceived takeout double, and 25% to West because he could have gotten it right by bidding diamonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ArtK78

ArtK78

Posted
Posted
I think 3NT is bad.  RHO will have one of the heart honors quite often.  And partner has not promised a moose.  I see little wrong with 4♦.

 

On the other hand the takeout double isn't so great either.  Overall I give 2/3 west and 1/3 east.

The 3♥ opening was red against white at IMPs. I would guess that the 3♥ bidder will have the AK of hearts about 80%+ of the time.

 

Besides, it is not impossible for partner's takeout double to have a heart card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mikeh

mikeh

Posted
Posted

I think E was too aggressive doubling...I think it close opposite an unpassed hand and flat out wrong given partner's passed hand status.

 

We have minimal hcp and short spades. Moreover, given that partner is a passed hand, there is at least some chance that LHO is about to raise hearts...and our double may given away the trump suit....as, indeed, it would have on this hand had N declared any number of hearts.

 

Too many people seem to think that it is a crime to pass with 12 or 13 counts, almost regardless of the auction.

 

As for West....I have sympathy, because if he doesn't bid 3N now, it will never happen. But I think his hand is too light....there is way too much chance that even if he has a heart stopper (which is unclear) he can't run 8 side winners before N gets in. So put me down for a timid 4♦.

 

Were the vulnerability reversed, I'd like 3N better....more upside from a red game, more chance that partner has a good hand at unfavourable opposite a passed hand, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pooltuna

pooltuna

Posted
Posted
I think E was too aggressive doubling...I think it close opposite an unpassed hand and flat out wrong given partner's passed hand status.

 

We have minimal hcp and short spades. Moreover, given that partner is a passed hand, there is at least some chance that LHO is about to raise hearts...and our double may given away the trump suit....as, indeed, it would have on this hand had N declared any number of hearts.

 

Too many people seem to think that it is a crime to pass with 12 or 13 counts, almost regardless of the auction.

 

As for West....I have sympathy, because if he doesn't bid 3N now, it will never happen. But I think his hand is too light....there is way too much chance that even if he has a heart stopper (which is unclear) he can't run 8 side winners before N gets in. So put me down for a timid 4♦.

 

Were the vulnerability reversed, I'd like 3N better....more upside from a red game, more chance that partner has a good hand at unfavourable opposite a passed hand, etc

This sounds pretty good to me. BTW looks like another adage has bitten the dust. That being "It takes a minimal opening hand opposite a minimal opening hand to make game" If you believe that is the ♥ void worth that much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the hog

the hog

Posted
Posted
They were red and you were white:

 

[hv=d=w&v=n&w=st2hq94dajt43cj73&e=sak9hdq976ckt6542]266|100|Scoring: XIMP[/hv]

 

Pa-3♥-X-Pa

3NT-All Pass

 

Down only two.

Partner is a passed hand already? What is your upside in doubling, especially with only 3S and a hand that will likely be forced at trick one? A poor double!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mike777

mike777

Posted
Posted
They were red and you were white:

 

<!-- EASTWEST begin --><table border='1'> <tr> <td> <table> <tr> <td>Dealer:</td> <td> West </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Vul:</td> <td> N/S </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Scoring:</td> <td> XIMP </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> <table> <tr> <th> <table> <tr> <th class='spades'>♠</th> <td> T2 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='hearts'>♥</th> <td> Q94 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='diamonds'>♦</th> <td> AJT43 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='clubs'>♣</th> <td> J73 </td> </tr> </table> </th> <th> <table> <tr> <th class='spades'>♠</th> <td> AK9 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='hearts'>♥</th> <td>  </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='diamonds'>♦</th> <td> Q976 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='clubs'>♣</th> <td> KT6542 </td> </tr> </table> </th> </tr> </table> </td> <td>  </td> </tr> </table><!-- EASTWEST end -->

 

Pa-3♥-X-Pa

3NT-All Pass

 

Down only two.

pass pard could not open......i only got 3s....no x...here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
655321

655321

Posted
Posted

OP has shown us just 2 hands for this ATB.

 

I wonder what the comments would be if we knew all four hands.

 

Would the passers be so critical of the horrendous result of -100 if the alternative were -140? Or are EW cold for game in a minor, if so passing throughout is not an obvious route to getting there. I think we can be pretty sure that EW do make 5♣ and/or 5♦, otherwise what would be the point of a post asking us to ATB for bidding a game and scoring -100 when the game doesn't make instead of defending a partscore for -140 or +100.

 

Anyway, I think that double by East is completely routine, and passing instead would be bad. West has the interesting decision, and very reasonably tried 3NT. Perhaps 4♦ is a better bid, my guess is that it is not, but I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mcphee

mcphee

Posted
Posted

With vulnerable opps it would be a consideration for the hand that bid 3NT to have passed the dble in many cases. Perhaps the dble hand should have considered moving to 4C based on this thought. As Art points out, would this 4C bid now show some big hand. I have never really considered this bidding problem.

 

Looking at e/w hands it seems that 5 of either minor is not at all unreasonable and is a contract you would like to be able to reach. The double is aggressive, but the fact is this is the only chance E will have to let his side enter the auction and failing to bid could easily lead to a missed game. If E does bid what else makes any sense other than dble?

 

The west player was up against a difficult choice with the option of passing, 3N, and 4 or 5D. Bidding 4D partner is going to pass most days and at imps you would hate to be there if 5 had play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the hog

the hog

Posted
Posted

Two down looks like the best result possible here. Would 6 down be impossible? (Unlikely? Yes, but not impossible).

C to the Q, D return and hook loses, another C and now 7 hearts. Sure the opps probably had 4 H on, but they didn't bid it did they? I think the double opposite a passed hand and with only 3 spades is a very poor call; hardly routine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aguahombre

aguahombre

Posted
Posted
Two down looks like the best result possible here. Would 6 down be impossible? (Unlikely? Yes, but not impossible).

C to the Q, D return and hook loses, another C and now 7 hearts. Sure the opps probably had 4 H on, but they didn't bid it did they? I think the double opposite a passed hand and with only 3 spades is a very poor call; hardly routine.

the problem is that the experts on the forum need to "do something" every hand. You will be outvoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the hog

the hog

Posted
Posted
Two down looks like the best result possible here. Would 6 down be impossible? (Unlikely? Yes, but not impossible).

C to the Q, D return and hook loses, another C and now 7 hearts. Sure the opps probably had 4 H on, but they didn't bid it did they? I think the double opposite a passed hand and with only 3 spades is a very poor call; hardly routine.

the problem is that the experts on the forum need to "do something" every hand. You will be outvoted.

You forgot quotation marks aguahombre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aguahombre

aguahombre

Posted
Posted
Two down looks like the best result possible here. Would 6 down be impossible? (Unlikely? Yes, but not impossible).

C to the Q, D return and hook loses, another C and now 7 hearts. Sure the opps probably had 4 H on, but they didn't bid it did they? I think the double opposite a passed hand and with only 3 spades is a very poor call; hardly routine.

the problem is that the experts on the forum need to "do something" every hand. You will be outvoted.

You forgot quotation marks aguahombre.

no...I put the quotes around "do something"....and still recognize my superiors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...