Bbradley62 Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 [hv=d=s&v=n&s=sk843hqt94dt8ca96]133|100|Scoring: XIMPP-(1♣)-Dbl-(2♣)??[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 I'd start with X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 yep, x seems to be the only call which tries to get us to the correct strain. Do I raise when pard chooses a major? Yes, I think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 I thought there was a notion that at low levels, a responsive X implied a 3-card major holdings while if you had 4 you bid them. On this hand I am bidding 2S, then 3H if 3C comes back around to me. I can see where you can agree that X shows 4-4 majors, but I didn't expect that to be the majority interpretation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayin801 Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 I thought there was a notion that at low levels, a responsive X implied a 3-card major holdings while if you had 4 you bid them. On this hand I am bidding 2S, then 3H if 3C comes back around to me. I can see where you can agree that X shows 4-4 majors, but I didn't expect that to be the majority interpretation. Except partner could be 4-3 in the majors for their t/o X and by making a responsive X we find our 4-4 fit. I have no idea what 3♣ would be here. Just more shape, like 5-5 and not enough to want to go to game? I can't think of any other hand I'd bid 3♣ on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 I thought there was a notion that at low levels, a responsive X implied a 3-card major holdings while if you had 4 you bid them. On this hand I am bidding 2S, then 3H if 3C comes back around to me. I can see where you can agree that X shows 4-4 majors, but I didn't expect that to be the majority interpretation. that notion is applicable after 1M (X) 2M (X) where the responsive doubler would have bid the focus major if he/she had 4 of them. When the double is of a minor which was raised, things change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 I have 3♣ defined here as invitational with 44 majors, so that's perfect. Without it I'd try a responsive dbl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Normal responsive double. It doesn't make sense for a double to deny hearts and spades and the opponent's suit. If it did deny all of those things why don't we just bid the remaining suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.