Hanoi5 Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Red vs White, you get: ♠AT96532♥654♦♣964 1♥-??? Let's suppose you pass: 1♥-Pa-1NT*-X2♣-??? And finally: 1♥-Pa-1NT*-X2♥-2♠-3♦-X3♥-Pa-Pa-3♠Pa-??? How many spades in each case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 2, 3 and abstain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Q1) 2♠ only at MP at IMPS I passQ2) 2♠ this is an unforced callQ3) 4♠ partner should not be bidding on Swiss cheese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Kid Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 2♠ right away, problem solved :lol: Preempt wth preemptive hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Would have bid 2♠ straight away. After pard doubles, it's an obvious 4♠... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 2S now. 3S is forgiveable but risky against greedy opps. I'd much rather bid now than later. Preempting after opps know their strength and distribution sorta misses the point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 [double-post deleted] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 pass 4 Spade 4 Spade, but this scenario had been impossible of course... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 1S the first time, 4S the 2nd time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigel_k Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 2♠ WJO, otherwise 1♠ so the second round problem would never come up. It's a definite 4♠ bid though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 1S the first time, 4S the 2nd time. Indeed. Pass on the first round I can understand, but 2♠ on the second round I really don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 I don't like 3S on the 2nd round either, partner will pass with a lot of hands where game is good especially since he probably only has 3 spades and we didn't overcall 1S. Obv a lot depends on his club holding. If he has, say Kxx vs Axx that can swing 2 or 3 tricks sometimes. But sometimes they have to lead a club rather than a heart to capitalize, or underlead their heart the 2nd round. And if worst comes to worst and he has neither round suit ace it's possible we're going down in 3 anyways. I don't feel like partner will be able to evaluate well enough over 3, and will be overly worried about trumps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I don't understand the first pass, I prefer 1 2 and 3. If you don't think it makes it to 3 and you hate to bid 1 on such a weak hand then why not 2? I would abstain after the initial pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLOGIC Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I'll assume talks of bidding 3 are a joke. If someone doesn't bid 2, presumably it's because they don't deem the hand good enough. This seems reasonable with 3 small hearts, but I think the 7 card suit combined with the T9 of spades makes this too conservative. If someone doesn't bid 1 presumably it's because their style makes this unacceptable and they will get buried/their partner will double/or something. If 1S was not an option I'd rank 2S>>>P>>>>>>>>>>>>>3S but I am happy to bid 1 so w/e. I think not bidding 2 is just a conservative view. I could see how one could have a style/set of agreements where they pass, but the final result that you have to pass with this hand seems ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I also feel something like 1 > 2 >>> 3 but I definitely think 3 > P, even though it's obviously risky and too much to bid. I think what I have learned from this is I can't stand to pass on this hand! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mich-b Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I bid 2♠ when I held this hand - in our style the 7th ♠ compensates for the general weakness , and the vulnerability.Actually , partner who held ♠KQJx told me later he knew I held a 7 card suit, since I needed a 7th card to bid 2♠ with a weak suit at that vulnerability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 I can't bid 2♠ the first time as we play intermediate jump overcalls. 1♠ is reasonable I wouldn't bid 3♠ this weak Maybe pass is possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 Let's suppose you pass: this is quite defamatory. I died in a shock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszeszycki Posted July 12, 2010 Report Share Posted July 12, 2010 ♠AT96532♥654♦♣9641♥-??? Let's suppose you pass: 1♥-Pa-1NT*-X2♣-??? And finally: 1♥-Pa-1NT*-X2♥-2♠-3♦-X3♥-Pa-Pa-3♠Pa-??? How many spades in each case? pass 2s pass overcall 1s (r vs w) can do nothing except incite insanity in future partners (this one will leave you after seeing your "overcall")I have much more sympathy for those that try the risky 2s than 1s. 2s having passed (thank gooodness) this 2s bid should not get p overly excited andrealize this bid is primarily based on length pass I have a partner that felt doubling 3d was a better shot than inviting 3sand their dia power is bad news opposite my void. I feel i would have to be lucky to make 3s at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted July 13, 2010 Report Share Posted July 13, 2010 Having bet to sandbag my 7xS suit on opening round, bet that was winner. Go cheap! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.