mikeh Posted July 7, 2010 Report Share Posted July 7, 2010 Now that everybody agrees I have nothing to add, but: Earlier this week I had 10 AQxx AK108xx Qx and it went 1C - (3S), all red at IMPs. Double or 4D? I bid 4D on automataic pilot but I now think double is quite a bit better.I think you should stay on autopilot rather than thinking yourself into a negative double. Surely partner will bid a natural 4♥ over 4♦ if he holds any 4 card heart suit? The only contracts you miss via 4♦ are 3N and 3♠x'd. You would be uncomfortable passing 3N on the one hand.....and if you don't pass, what do you bid...and what does that show?....and while defending 3♠ may work, and would certainly collect a decent number if he has his leave-in, you're surely going to be worried that you had a better spot...like at the 6 level. And what does the poor fellow do with say xx Kxx Qxx AKxxx? Or Axx Kx QJx KJxxx. Not that 4♦ is a panacea, but I hate concealing a slam suitable trump suit AND slam suitable high cards merely to cater to 3N or defending, both of which decisions will be made by partner based on what he expects a middle-of-the-road double should deliver....not what I actually hold. If he does bid 4♥ over 4♦, I have an easy spade cue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pirate22 Posted July 10, 2010 Report Share Posted July 10, 2010 if one is ply sayc-sayc2/1----and p opens 1cl opp comes in 1sp--x (neg) shows8+ points any shape-you are looking for pards rebid,(If 3sp comes in)and p silent one canstill x Usually if you bid as suggested 2d thats showing no tol for cl and a weak hand 7/8 points Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryallen Posted July 10, 2010 Report Share Posted July 10, 2010 Now that everybody agrees I have nothing to add, but: Earlier this week I had 10 AQxx AK108xx Qx and it went 1C - (3S), all red at IMPs. Double or 4D? I bid 4D on automataic pilot but I now think double is quite a bit better.I think you should stay on autopilot rather than thinking yourself into a negative double. Surely partner will bid a natural 4♥ over 4♦ if he holds any 4 card heart suit? The only contracts you miss via 4♦ are 3N and 3♠x'd. You would be uncomfortable passing 3N on the one hand.....and if you don't pass, what do you bid...and what does that show?....and while defending 3♠ may work, and would certainly collect a decent number if he has his leave-in, you're surely going to be worried that you had a better spot...like at the 6 level. And what does the poor fellow do with say xx Kxx Qxx AKxxx? Or Axx Kx QJx KJxxx. Not that 4♦ is a panacea, but I hate concealing a slam suitable trump suit AND slam suitable high cards merely to cater to 3N or defending, both of which decisions will be made by partner based on what he expects a middle-of-the-road double should deliver....not what I actually hold. If he does bid 4♥ over 4♦, I have an easy spade cue. The problem is that bypassing 3♠x and 3NT are significant. You have the addition that if partner bypasses 3NT, you have a lot of values working for you in a possible slam. Nothing to stop you venturing past 3NT and stopping in 4NT or 5 of a minor, the only real worry comes with leaving the hand in 3♠x. But as partners hand lies under the pre-empt, I believe that would take the edge from that decision? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.