Jump to content

what now?


Recommended Posts

I'd prefer to have shown diamonds and hearts rather than hearts and diamonds, but I realise that your methods may not allow this.

 

I think 4 is a signoff. If so, we're not in a great position. 4 opposite Hx isn't going to be good, but 5 and 4NT might also be in difficulties. Can I go back to 3NT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were any of these bids artificial?

 

What is the NT range?

 

Is the NT opener allowed to be a 4225 or a 5224?

 

If 2 is a transfer to , opener has denied 3 so if he's not allowed to have the 5422 shapes, he must have at least 3 so 6 doesn't need very much to be cold if the NT opener has sharp cards.

 

Accordingly, if 1NT is 15-17 and we aren't allowed to open 1NT with two doubletons, I'm going to try a 4 cue and if partner bid 5 I'll have a punt a 6. It would've been nice to have a universal agreement that 4m is RKCB in that minor.

 

Also, I strongly agree with gnasher that this hand should've shown first. Given the quality of the red suits, there could even be merit in ignoring the suit and treating it as a single-suited slam try with .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going back to 3NT if you wanna really pass is another option Andy, in fact I almost passed there.

It was a serious suggestion. 3NT shouldn't just deny three hearts, it should also show black-suit cards. 5 could easily have three top losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...