helene_t Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 The standard resolution of that loop is that the side going first has to declare its methods first. This is different to deciding on your system in first seat if the opponents have already defined their 2nd seat openings. I don't understand this. N is dealer. NS specify the meaning of a 1st seat pass. Now EW can define their 2nd seat opening scheme based on this. Suppose you encounter a pair that plays Lorenzo, i.e. 1st seat pass is 8-11 points (fwiw this is not a HUM so will be allowed in most places, though not in EBU-land I think). You normally play standard methods but you agree with p that when this pair is dealer and passes in first seat, you will play strong club instead. Now they say: "Oh you play strong club in second seat? Then we don't play Lorenzo in first seat against you". It seems to me an example of the "loop". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdanno Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 I think Richard and Helene have spent too much time thinking about problems that don't exist in the real world.In the real world, your second seat opponents tell you, if you ask them, "we play strong club" or "we play 2/1" or "we play ACOL", they don't tell you "we play strong club if you play SEF and 2/1 if you play Polish club". In that case, you can decide to play MisIry against ACOL, polish club against strong club and SEF against 2/1. But I guess, that case is so remote in a BBF discussion that Frances' point got completely lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 So in the real world, it is the second-seat pair that has to specify their methods first, and then the first-seat pair has the privilege to decide which system to play afterwards? I find that very strange. Or is it that in the real world, you can always alter your method depending on opps' methods because the chance that they will then subsequently alter their methods is nil? But OK of course in the real real world, nobody plays different systems depending on which system opps play so of course it doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 But OK of course in the real real world, nobody plays different systems depending on which system opps play so of course it doesn't matter. That may be the case the vast majority of the time, but I can imagine a situation (in a place far, far away from ACBL) where a pair wants to play a different system against a forcing pass pair in a serious event, especially if the forcing pass opponents are considered favorites and there is ample time to prepare ahead of time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.