el mister Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 What do you make of this sequence (me south)? [hv=d=e&v=e&n=sak109ha652d9643cj&s=sq85hk984d1087c643]133|200|Scoring: IMP- - P P1♣ X 3♣ pp X p 3♥p p 4♣ pp X all pass[/hv] Should I come in over 3♣ with such a pish hand? Anyhow, partner insists (should he?), so I show hearts. What then does his final double mean? Is it a clear penalty? I left it in and we got a good score in the end, so I guess he did well to get the 4♣ bid out of opps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Over 3♣ pass is clear. If partner has extra's he'll Dbl, which is what he did. Your 3♥ is the best you can do obviously: no values or shape to bid 4♥ I don't understand partner's Dbl on 4♣: you haven't shown any values yet, he may have 3 tricks, but that's all. Anyway, with the South hand I'd pass 4♣x, because I don't have extras or shape to consider a 4♥ bid (and the Dbl probably indicates there's no ♥ fit). EW are vul, so lets just hope it goes down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I dislike partners second double.I hate his 3. double. He got lucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Just because partner has A AK and good shape it doesn't give him the right to sell his hand as a balanced 21 count (the third double I mean). His second double was also false advertising but it could work out sometimes. So you bid perfectly and your partner bid 66% wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Over 3♣ pass is clear. If partner has extra's he'll Dbl, which is what he did. Did he have extra's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vuroth Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Should I come in over 3♣ with such a pish hand? Imo YES. Partner has promised extras. All he's lacking is direction. I agree with the assessment of your partner's bidding, but I think you have a clear 3♥. It's probably not terribly close to being a pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 vuroth? when did partner show extras, I think you're misunderstanding something. The OP had the following questions:-should he bid over 1C-x-3C-?-should his partner x again over1C-x-3C-pp-?-whether the double here is for penalties:1c-x-3C-pp-x-p-3H4C-x What you quoted was the first question so partner has not, until that point, shown extras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 What do you make of this sequence (me south)? [hv=d=e&v=e&n=sak109ha652d9643cj&s=sq85hk984d1087c643]133|200|Scoring: IMP- - P P1♣ X 3♣ pp X p 3♥p p 4♣ pp X all pass[/hv] Should I come in over 3♣ with such a pish hand? Anyhow, partner insists (should he?), so I show hearts. What then does his final double mean? Is it a clear penalty? I left it in and we got a good score in the end, so I guess he did well to get the 4♣ bid out of opps.Q1] IMO noQ2] he should NOT! unless he thinks you didn't hear him the first timeQ3] the opponents aren't making this!Q4] IMO yesQ5] yes he is an idiot IMO, got lucky, and even a blind pig finds an occasional acorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 if I had say xxxxxxxxxxxxx I would definitely bid: 1C-x-3C-pp-x-p-3H4C-x-p-4H So the last X is not pure penalty. He just tells you that he has more points than hitherto expressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Over 3♣ pass is clear. If partner has extra's he'll Dbl, which is what he did. Did he have extra's? Did I say that? I only said (or meant to say) he doubled... :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Over 3♣ pass is clear. If partner has extra's he'll Dbl, which is what he did. Did he have extra's? Did I say that? I only said (or meant to say) he doubled... :rolleyes: You are right. Having is not Commutative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 even a blind pig finds an occasional acorn I wasn't aware that a pig, blind or otherwise, was looking for acorns (although I guess that a pig would find one every so often). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 http://www.coestatepark.com/wild_pig.htm says in several places that pigs eat acorns, they even have to compete with deer for the valuable little nuts. Apparently acorns sometimes constitute as much as 25% of deer's diets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wank Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 the second double showed extras which he didn't have. the 3rd double showed even more extra which he even more didn't have. it implies only 3 hearts otherwise with extras and 4H he'll often bid 4H himself, so yes you should pass it as you've got a flat bag of crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts