mohitz Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 ♠Qxx ♥QTxx ♦Jxxx ♣xx We non vul, they vul (2♥) - p - (p) - X( p ) - ? EDIT: We play lebensohl in this position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 2♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mich-b Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 2NT Leb , intending to play 3♦.I have sympathy for (a courageous?) PASS , especially if it's MP.I don't like 2♠ - that is too likely to get raised , or to be a 3-3 fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 2NT trnf to 3D at imps, pass at mps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 ♠Qxx ♥QTxx ♦Jxxx ♣xx We non vul, they vul (2♥) - p - (p) - X( p ) - ? EDIT: We play lebensohl in this position. 2s really easy so far...other posts insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted June 13, 2010 Report Share Posted June 13, 2010 I'd bid 2NT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted June 14, 2010 Report Share Posted June 14, 2010 2N then 3♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted June 14, 2010 Report Share Posted June 14, 2010 If this isn't a bad hand with 4 diamonds, I will pretend it is ---and be blissfully "insane". Leben, then 3D is just fine, though I suspect it won't go that way. Either Lefty was lying in the bushes to belt anything, or partner has a great hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted June 14, 2010 Report Share Posted June 14, 2010 2♠. I don't like this, but it seems better than 3♦... Perhaps pard will bid 2NT over 2♠, to which I can pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted June 14, 2010 Report Share Posted June 14, 2010 ♠Qxx ♥QTxx ♦Jxxx ♣xx We non vul, they vul (2♥) - p - (p) - X( p ) - ? EDIT: We play lebensohl in this position. an argument can be made for pass, 2♠, or 2NT. Remembering the adage that "TOX are for taking out" I would go with 2NT over 2♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted June 14, 2010 Report Share Posted June 14, 2010 2S for me. If I'm going to have to play a 4-3 fit I'd rather do it at the 2 level in a major than at the 3 level in a minor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.