Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you endanger your contract trying to beer, but it works (and you don't pitch any tricks), it's legit right? Whereas if you go down when you could have made it now you owe your partner, correct?

 

A regular forum guy says even if you're in danger of going down -- no beer.

 

Personally I disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can risk your contract for beer, but if you do so and it actually costs the contract (or even an extra trick), you owe your partner a case.

Yeah that seems pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always played that you can't make a "less tricks" line of play for the beer, even if it makes the contract, which is why I ask about this one. If the non-beer line of play makes +1 against anything but a 5-0, but goes down otherwise, and the beer line makes 100%, the question is does taking the beer play count as "pitching a trick" at MPs? I agree with kfay, at IMPs it seems automatic (because it's the "right play" anyway).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...the question is does taking the beer play count as "pitching a trick" at MPs?...

At MPs - with those odds - in my view it is pitching a trick.

 

Nick

Assuming, of course, that your contract is not so superior that you already have all of the matchpoints for going plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...