hanp Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 [hv=d=n&v=n&s=sakxxxh109dj10xxxcx]133|100|Scoring: Patton[/hv] 1D - (2D*) - 2S** - (4H)5C - (p) - ?? 2D showed the majors, 2S showed a limit raise or better for diamonds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Were we in a forcing pass situation? V vs NV with limit raise or better sets up a forcing pass according to Robson-Segal, but some people argue that the vulnerability shouldn't influence this. Not sure in which camp you belong... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jukmoi Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 6♦. I think 5♣ is a cuebid. If we use italian style cuebids partner has denied ♠ control. If partner has made a slam invitation holding ♠xx then I dont think we should be too worried about ♥ control. Since we only hold values for a limit I will bid only 6♦. Maybe 5♠ would be too encouracing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Don't bid slam!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted June 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 I'm pretty sure that partner didn't think that 2S created a forcing pass either, and I don't regard Robson-Segal as the ultimate competitive bidding bible. In the meantime, partner has made a slam try so who cares. Could you explain your post kfay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 In that case I'll just bid 5♠, we don't need that much for grand slam in partner's hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Dealer: North Vul: N/S Scoring: Patton ♠ AKxxx ♥ 109 ♦ J10xxx ♣ x 1D - (2D*) - 2S** - (4H)5C - (p) - ?? 2D showed the majors, 2S showed a limit raise or better for diamonds. not sure what the meta agreements should be for this. Looks like partner has a ♠ or ♥ problem but he still made a slam try. I will risk trusting the opps to have a 10 card fit and assume partner has 2 low ♠s -- 6♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Does partner double 4H with H-xx(x), ie. no H-control fearing 6D fails.Then 5C cues with H-control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Without a forcing pass (I've played it both ways, and both methods are reasonable), I cannot determine is pard is xx, xx, or x, xx or xx, x, so I'm not throwing away a vulnerable game at (partial) IMPs on the hope I guess right, so I pass. There's a fair chance if I pass in tempo that LHO will take the push to 5♥, and now partner can make a forcing pass (due to 5♣), and we can then confidently take the push to 6. Good problem! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Sorry, you're right. Partner is showing a heart control. Although slam could easily still be on a hook. If the control is a stiff, I think I would want to only bid 5d if it's an ace then 6d. I think 6s is asking for too much, partner could be staring at the world and bid grand off Qxxx of trimps. Furthermore he'll have to ruff a LOT of clubs, if they're not solid and a bad trump split would probably scuttle us, that's with him holding D AKQ. Frankly I feel like stiff heart is just as likely as the ace on this auction which, in my mind, makes the slam 50/50 so I just wimp out and bid game. Certainly in the process barring partner from bidding slam on his own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo81 Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 I would bid 6♦. The 5th trump and ♠AK are pretty good holdings here. Hopefully partner has something like xx x AQxxxx AQxx as opposed to xx x Axxxx AKJxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jukmoi Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Without a forcing pass (I've played it both ways, and both methods are reasonable), I cannot determine is pard is xx, xx, or x, xx or xx, x, so I'm not throwing away a vulnerable game at (partial) IMPs on the hope I guess right, so I pass. There's a fair chance if I pass in tempo that LHO will take the push to 5♥, and now partner can make a forcing pass (due to 5♣), and we can then confidently take the push to 6. Good problem! You might also end playing 5.♣? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Without a forcing pass (I've played it both ways, and both methods are reasonable), I cannot determine is pard is xx, xx, or x, xx or xx, x, so I'm not throwing away a vulnerable game at (partial) IMPs on the hope I guess right, so I pass. There's a fair chance if I pass in tempo that LHO will take the push to 5♥, and now partner can make a forcing pass (due to 5♣), and we can then confidently take the push to 6. Good problem! You might also end playing 5.♣? Oy, sorry, yeah 5♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted June 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Alright, say you bid 6D as I did. (I now think this was a mistake so I'd be interested to hear more comments). LHO bids 6H which is passed around to you. What do you do? To Free: partner's pass was forcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted June 9, 2010 Report Share Posted June 9, 2010 After .. 6D, <6H> P <P> ?? First H-control and leaving grand for consideration - from partner's non-double.WOW! Grand looks good, but I've already pushed hard for 6D. Double 6H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunch3nt Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 If 5C is a cuebid, then 6D was an error as in this specific situation, it should be mandatory to cue 5S with the Ace. Partner is unlimited and can easily have a hand cold for grand. Partner will never bid 7D holding a singleton heart. Now over partner's forcing pass, there is a huge premium at patton scoring for bidding the grand. Partner can have xx - AKxxx AKxxx or the same with the HA. If it is on a diamond finesse (or perhaps even club finesse) then it will probably work. I agree I have done a lot of bidding with this hand, but partner seems to want me to... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszeszycki Posted June 10, 2010 Report Share Posted June 10, 2010 I would jump to 6d and the only reason I would not bid 5s to search for 7 is because I am too afraid of a spade void in lho and a first round spade ruff.1 less spade and 1 more heart or dia and I bid 5s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wank Posted June 11, 2010 Report Share Posted June 11, 2010 i wouldn't have made a 5s grandie try on the previous round. people call cuebids compulsory when they're looking at mountains and just require certain cards from partner. when they have a less than mountainous hand they want partner's cuebids to be informative. however having jumped to 6D and partner's still interested i'll give it the 7th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanp Posted June 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 11, 2010 Partner had xx - AKQxxx AKxxx. Further thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted June 11, 2010 Report Share Posted June 11, 2010 Partner had xx - AKQxxx AKxxx. Further thoughts? I agree with wank - 5♠ would be too much with such bad trumps, but once partner invites a grand slam you should bid it. With partner's actual hand, he might just bid 7♦ anyway. It's hard to believe responder can have a 6♦ bid without at least ♠AQ, given how little he has elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.