Jump to content

pick your poison


mikeh

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=s&v=b&s=sak6hj87dakqcj642]133|100|Scoring: MP

You deal and, in deference to Milton Work, open 1. LHP bids 1 and partner's negative double comes back to you. What do you bid?[/hv]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. If it was an 18-count before, it still is one, and 2 is the way we bid a balanced 18-count without a heart stop.

 

If we do have a heart stop between us, it's not clear who should play it. With this layout:

             A10

 K109xxx        Qx

             Jxx

partner should play it, but with this

             AQx

 K109xx        xx

             Jxx

I should play it.

 

I prefer 2 because we may manage to get to 4 or 5 when there's no heart stop between the two hands, but partner happens to have enough extra to enable us to make. Something like QJxx xx Jxxx AKx would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with Jxx i'd prefer to get the NTs in first - i think it's much more likely we should be declaring it than p, but the chance of there being a better spot in a minor and the lesser, but significant, chance that it's ok from partner's hand anyway makes me go for 2H.

 

and i believe in downgrading as well as upgrading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very strong preference for 2N, I'm fine calling Jxx a stopper. Even if they can run the suit they often will fail to (LHO not leading from AQ at MP).

 

I think there are far far far more layouts where we need to declare when we have a stopper. Kxx in dummy with AQ on our left, and Axx in dummy with KQ on our left being the most obvious. Yes opposite either of those if RHO has Hx it plays better from partner's side, but given their vulnerable overcall I think that is way less likely.

 

Even when partner has Ax LHO might choose to underlead the heart, or not lead the heart at all.

 

Meanwhile I think our prospects in any contract other than NT when we have no stopper are quite bleak. Our hand is just garbage for anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2NT seems best to me, Jxx is nearly a stopper and the auction will be far simpler than after 2 where frankly I don't think most people (myself included) have a fantastic idea what they are doing for the rest of the auction.

 

I wouldn't do it at the table because I don't want to be wrong in that direction, but I'm fairly confident downgrading to begin with is right on this hand in the long run btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do it at the table because I don't want to be wrong in that direction, but I'm fairly confident downgrading to begin with is right on this hand in the long run btw.

Mikeh, in the OP alludes to this. Phil outright would open 1NT. And you, deep down, know it is right to open it 1NT.

 

Maybe, It's a 1NT opener. I know nobody downgrades at your level, but you could lie about seeing one of the Jacks, in the postmortem. Me, I have no reputation to worry about, so it is easy to open 1NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do it at the table because I don't want to be wrong in that direction, but I'm fairly confident downgrading to begin with is right on this hand in the long run btw.

Mikeh, in the OP alludes to this. Phil outright would open 1NT. And you, deep down, know it is right to open it 1NT.

 

Maybe, It's a 1NT opener. I know nobody downgrades at your level, but you could lie about seeing one of the Jacks, in the postmortem. Me, I have no reputation to worry about, so it is easy to open 1NT.

Looks like routine 1NT for me. An d I have reputation of upgrading a lot. :)

 

In fact 1nt with 4333 18 HCP has produced an Ave- and 3 close to tops in pairs. I started doing that in the last fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very strong preference for 2N, I'm fine calling Jxx a stopper. Even if they can run the suit they often will fail to (LHO not leading from AQ at MP).

 

I think there are far far far more layouts where we need to declare when we have a stopper. Kxx in dummy with AQ on our left, and Axx in dummy with KQ on our left being the most obvious. Yes opposite either of those if RHO has Hx it plays better from partner's side, but given their vulnerable overcall I think that is way less likely.

 

Even when partner has Ax LHO might choose to underlead the heart, or not lead the heart at all.

 

Meanwhile I think our prospects in any contract other than NT when we have no stopper are quite bleak. Our hand is just garbage for anything else.

ya....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=s&v=b&s=sak6hj87dakqcj642]133|100|Scoring: MP

You deal and, in deference to Milton Work, open 1. LHP bids 1 and partner's negative double comes back to you. What do you bid?[/hv]

i'm going to call 2 not because it shows a big hand but because I want to bail out as cheaply as possible with many of partner's possible -X holdings. I too think you should have bit the 50 cal. bullet and just called 1NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=s&v=b&s=sak6hj87dakqcj642]133|100|Scoring: MP

You deal and, in deference to Milton Work, open 1. LHP bids 1 and partner's negative double comes back to you. What do you bid?[/hv]

2. I already pretended to have an eighteen count. I'm not going to pretend to have a heart guard also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. I already pretended to have an eighteen count. I'm not going to pretend to have a heart guard also.

You won't stay in the Cool Guy club very long evaluating hands like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hand didn't develope as I have posted, because responder held QJxx in spades with a soft 4=3=5=1 6 count (all queens and jacks) and chose to pass. I hold a question and answer each week before the game, where the idea is to encourage questions about hands from the previous week...we have hand records for this game.

 

I was asked what one should rebid if the auction had included a negative double, and had to say that I wasn't at all sure what was best.

 

But the reason I said that I was fairly sure that I wouldn't bid 2 is that in my book it creates a force, such that responder can take a call without fear that opener will pass at his next opportunity.

 

Thus with a good hand and a good club fit, for example, responder might bid 3 to show the fit, confident that opener won't pass. Then what??

 

I don't like making bids that promise another call and then passing: responder will think he has no need to jump or recue...he can show where he lives and then show strength, if he holds it, next time.

 

Do any of the 2 bidders have any thoughts on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do any of the 2 bidders have any thoughts on this?

I'll reiterate my desire to open 1N.

 

However, I'm on the record for 2. Its not that I love it, but I like 2N less, although I have been swayed by the 2N bidders. This hand does look very 'no-trumpy' and if you choose not to open 1N because its too strong, this is a reasonable valuation in spite of the shaky stop.

 

If I started with 2, I would hope for a 2 stall from partner that would let me clarify my hand, and I would with 2N.

 

If I heard 3 I would bid 3N but I wouldn't least comfortable about it, except I hope partner could infer that my heart stopper isn't very robust since I didn't bid NT the 1st time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...