bd71 Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [hv=d=n&v=b&e=skqxxhaxxxxdxxcxx&s=saxxxhkqtxdxxxcax]266|200|Scoring: IMPPenultimate board of 28-board team match with intermediate/advanced players. You were up 15 at half, and feel good about 2nd half so far...especially since you made 3HX+1 on last hand and it's a real longshot the other team will ever bid 4H. Opponents comments suggest they are desperate. Their unopposed bidding on this hand:1♣-1♥3♣-3N5♣-6♣ You lead K♠, taken by dummy's A♠. Declarer then ruffs a spade and leads a low heart. What do you play?[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 duck is good when partner has 2 slow diamond tricks, raise will be good when he's got ♦A wich one is most likelly? I think ♦A is more likelly this time, and add to that that he might even have a trump trick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 duck is good when partner has 2 slow diamond tricks, raise will be good when he's got ♦A wich one is most likelly? I think ♦A is more likelly this time, and add to that that he might even have a trump trick. so you are saying declarer found a 3♣ call holding [hv=s=sxhxdkqjxckqjxxxx]133|100|[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 yeah, more likelly than ♦AKxx, specially when you think of the likelly 8 card club suits. and that partner might have ♣K, wich even stiff, is a likelly trick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 Two main possibilities: - Declarer has x, x, Axx, KQJxxxxx (we need to duck) or - Declarer has the hand Fluffy describes, or perhaps more likely: x, x, KQx, KQJxxxxx (we need to win). Initially, I was going to ask "what spade did partner play on the 2nd round", but I can't see how partner would signal suit preference any differently holding the ♦A versus holding the ♦KQJ. It seems to me that there are five KQ"x" combinations, but there are six Axx combinations. Not much to go by, but it looks right to duck this. EDIT: Saw Fluffy's ♦AKxx....good point - ducking is right with AKxx / AQxx too - (more likely combos too) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bd71 Posted May 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 so you are saying declarer found a 3♣ call holding Dealer: ????? Vul: ???? Scoring: Unknown ♠ x ♥ x ♦ KQJx ♣ KQJxxxx So remember that North (me) and South were desperate... My actual holding was not much better than suggested here... xxAJxxKQxxxxx Congrats to those who ducked because you eliminated my only chance at slam. At the table, LHO went up with the Ace and led another. When clubs broke 2-2 and the J♥ dropped under the Q♥ I had the 23-point slam. Those who ducked won a net of 24 IMPs since our counterparts bid and made 3N. I know I got lucky here on many fronts (club split, A♥ onside, J♥ falling)...I posted this to clear up whether I was also lucky in getting less-than-optimal defense. Seems like that's the case. Punchline...we still lost by 50 IMPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.