Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been rereading Robson/Segal, and there are two sequences where I'm not quite convinced by their use for 2NT:

 

1-(1)-p-(2)-2NT according to R/S is Lebensohl (a.k.a. Good/Bad), but what about strong balanced hands with a heart stopper? (As a matter of fact, since I like opening all 17-19 balanced hands 1, I might play it as natural here but Lebensohl after 1 opening.)

 

(2)-p-(p)-X-(p)-2NT according to R/S is scrambling because, supposedly, with any good hand you could have bid, so now you are by definition weak and just probing for the right strain. However, I figure that in this auction I will have to pass some pretty decent hands in direct seat, and balancer will have some very tough decisions when he doesn't know whether I have 0 or 11.

 

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, I'm not sure if you've read their disclaimer that some of their treatments are rather controversial. That being said, your questions raise a few good points.

 

For the first sequence, how do you play your 1 openers, and what would X mean in that situation? It's difficult if we have no idea what your 1 opening shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. I play this as G/B with one partner. I play that double may contain the big balanced hands if control rich while I pass with the poor control hands. A minimum-ish unbalanced hand can often pass anyway (partner can double for penalties or bid 2N as t/o for the minors)

 

2. This may be a problem. I don't claim to know everything about scrambling, but your hand is pretty well defined in shape unless partner has 15+ or so. You are sacrificing a little accuracy in strength to make sure you play in the right strain when you have 3244 and partner has 2443 or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, I'm not sure if you've read their disclaimer that some of their treatments are rather controversial. That being said, your questions raise a few good points.

Sure, my question is not what to expect with a pickup partner, but what the best agreements are with a regular partner.

 

Let's assume that 1 will include at least some strong (17-19, 18-19 or 18-20) balanced hands, whether or not those hands can also be opened 1, and that it generally shows 3+ clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. I've played this as good/bad for a while now and haven't missed a natural 2n. Game prospects are significantly reduced when partner passes 1, and it could actually be quite dangerous to come in. In fact, I bet if you polled people about this auction with no agreements, plenty of people would say it's 4-6.

 

2. I agree with you and would play lebensohl here. But scrambling if doubler is a passed hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...