gnasher Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 (1) It goes 2♠ dbl pass You have a 3424 shape, and you play Lebensohl. What does a minimum 3♥ bid look like? (2) Same question, but the auction is 2♠ pass pass dblpass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 xxx KQxx xx Axxx xxx KQxx Jx Axxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
655321 Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 After the direct double I would bid 3♥ with pretty much any 3424 8 count. Maybe after the 4th seat double it should be a tiny bit stronger, but in practice I would still bid 3♥ with most if not all 8 counts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Agree I start at about 8+ with a 4 card suit. If I had a 5 card suit then 7 would be normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 And the maximums for 3H? And the GFs w/wo 4xH?Does anyone else leben 2N, then rebid above 3S is GF 2-suited? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 The balancing double of 2S is where we differ. Not wanting to hang partner for a shapely 10 count double, our non-leben 3H shows an opening hand which could not act directly over 2S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 And the maximums for 3H? And the GFs w/wo 4xH?Does anyone else leben 2N, then rebid above 3S is GF 2-suited? My maximum is 11. Take any of Mike's and add a K. GF with(out) 4 hearts? Depends on our agreements about direct / indirect 3N and cues. 2N then 3S is also invitational, not some two suiter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlall Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 I'm about .5 points heavier after a balancing X. Probably like half the 8 counts direct, and few 8 counts after a balancing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 uhh.. I am like 2 points heaviear after the balancing double. Even more if partner was a passed hand, not sure if lebenshol is optimal then but never messed around to change it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted May 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Even more if partner was a passed hand, not sure if lebenshol is optimal then but never messed around to change it. It might be better to play:2NT = weak with clubs or invitational+ with diamonds3♣ = weak with diamonds or invitational+ with hearts (5 if exactly invitational)3♦ = weak with hearts or game-forcing with clubs3♥ = invitational with exactly four hearts3♠ = stop-asking You lose the ability to show an invitational hand with clubs, but gain a lot of game-forcing sequences, and gain an extra way to show an invitation with hearts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OleBerg Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 uhh.. I am like 2 points heaviear after the balancing double. Even more if partner was a passed hand, not sure if lebenshol is optimal then but never messed around to change it. I am 2.5. I expect partner to reopen om a decent 10-count, so I would definitely like to have a way to tell him to raise with a decent 14. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlson Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Maybe it's obvious, but I would point out that my minimums for 3m are about a queen heavier than the minimum for 3♥, for which I more or less agree with the examples. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Even more if partner was a passed hand, not sure if lebenshol is optimal then but never messed around to change it. It might be better to play:2NT = weak with clubs or invitational+ with diamonds3♣ = weak with diamonds or invitational+ with hearts (5 if exactly invitational)3♦ = weak with hearts or game-forcing with clubs3♥ = invitational with exactly four hearts3♠ = stop-asking You lose the ability to show an invitational hand with clubs, but gain a lot of game-forcing sequences, and gain an extra way to show an invitation with hearts. An italian friend showed me something more simple, but probably with less accuracy even if it includes invitationals with clubs: 2NT= invitational (or more) -> 3♣ = negative, others GFanything else= sing off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluecalm Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Not wanting to hang partner for a shapely 10 count double, our non-leben 3H shows an opening hand which could not act directly over 2S. If you bid 3♥ with only "opening hands which could not act directly over 2♠) ie. something like: Axx KJxxx KJx xx you lose the purpose of lebensohl in my opinion as partner will be lost if he has normal t/o double with say 15hcp (as you are now 0-11 basically). I think those hands should just bid game. If partner has some shape those games will have some play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OleBerg Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Not wanting to hang partner for a shapely 10 count double, our non-leben 3H shows an opening hand which could not act directly over 2S. If you bid 3♥ with only "opening hands which could not act directly over 2♠) ie. something like: Axx KJxxx KJx xx you lose the purpose of lebensohl in my opinion as partner will be lost if he has normal t/o double with say 15hcp (as you are now 0-11 basically). I think those hands should just bid game. If partner has some shape those games will have some play. But those 15(+) hands are less frequent. Sometimes preempts works. What you have to do is minimize the damage. Edit: Thats why I am 10.5-11 as responder to a reopening double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.