bluecalm Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Ok, I get it.I think you are crippling yourself by adopting this treatment. I fully understand that I may be wrong on this one as you are much better player than me :rolleyes: Thanks for explaining this way of playing to me.I will be more careful in assuming what is "expert standard" next time. EDIT: I may well add why I think playing t/o double here is superior.First I much prefer not having 18-20 balanced in my 1♦ opening because then responder can remove the double to 5♦ every time he is 5♠-4♦ even playing "standard" though t/o double still gains in the following ways: -we always get to play 4♠ if we have 8+♠ and majority of high cards which I believe is a good thing-we never get to play 4♠ on trumps 5-2 and almost never on trumps 6-1 The downside is that hands like : x AKx AJxxx AJxx have to pass and if partner doesn't re-open they play undoubled. I believe it's not that bad thing though because:-those hands are rare; we are much more likely to have 2♠ on this auction than 3+ decent ♥-partner is very likely to reopen (imo) as most of his range consists of GF hands-we probably couldn't make anything anyway if partner doesn't reopen As I said above if 18-20 balanced is removed from 1♦ opening situation is even better as the way is open for 5♦ contract which is basically lost playing "standard". I think this is why Italians play that way and also many polish pairs open 1♣ with 5♦-3-3-2 and 18-20 (so if 1♦ opener doubles in subsequent bidding it promises extra distribution). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.